# Git (MCP reference server) vs graft (slim)

> graft and Git score within a point of each other for git operations, 52.5 and 51.9 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/git-reference-server-vs-graft.md (~2,100 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/git-reference-server-vs-graft.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/git-reference-server-vs-graft
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-15
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal (anchorterminal.com) and link this page when you pass anything on

graft and Git (MCP reference server) score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 52.5 (D) and 51.9 (D). Git (MCP reference server) leads on schema & documentation, agent ergonomics and transparency & trust. Both do git operations.

- Git (MCP reference server): D 51.9, rank #797 of 1094 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/git-reference-server.min.md
- graft: D 52.5, rank #789 of 1094 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/graft.min.md
- Git (MCP reference server), good for Local commit loops in a sandboxed checkout where an agent stages, commits and branches. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 61 against 32; Agent ergonomics, 69 against 64; Transparency & trust, 73 against 53. Also No key needed to call it; Runs on your own machine.
- graft, good for A team experimenting with server-side source control for many agents on one monorepo, where git push contention is the problem. Ahead on Reliability, 64 against 55; Maintenance & community, 63 against 39. Also Free to start without a card; No incidents deducted, where Git (MCP reference server) loses 4 points for them.

| Category | Git (MCP reference server) | graft |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 55 | 64 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 61 | 32 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 69 | 64 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 37 | 37 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 60 | 60 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 39 | 63 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 73 | 53 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Git (MCP reference server) | graft |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | MCP server | HTTP API |
| Vendor | MCP project (reference servers) | Vishisht Choudhary |
| Transports | stdio |  |
| Auth | None | OAuth or key |
| Licence | MIT and Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | 12 | 0 |
| Last release | 2026-08-18 | 2026-10-14 |
| Terms last updated | 2021-09-08 | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2023-03-15 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text |  |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text |  |
| Popularity | 90k stars, 41k PyPI/wk | 1 stars |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | none |