# Geoapify Location Platform + MCP vs OpenCage Geocoding API > OpenCage Geocoding API has a score of 69.5 (B) against Geoapify Location Platform + MCP's 55.5 (C). Both do geo geocode. The largest gap is reliability, 25 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/geoapify-vs-opencage - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/geoapify-vs-opencage.md (~1,500 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/geoapify-vs-opencage.min.md (~380 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/geoapify-vs-opencage.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-04 OpenCage Geocoding API has a score of 69.5 (B) against Geoapify Location Platform + MCP's 55.5 (C). Both do geo geocode. The largest gap is reliability, 25 points. - Geoapify Location Platform + MCP: grade C, 55.5/100, rank #314 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/geoapify.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/geoapify.json - OpenCage Geocoding API: grade B, 69.5/100, rank #113 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/opencage.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/opencage.json ## Which one, for what Pick Geoapify Location Platform + MCP for nothing in particular (no category where it leads by five points or more). Pick OpenCage Geocoding API for reliability (+25), agent ergonomics (+14), security & auth (+18), payments & pricing (+5), maintenance & community (+5), transparency & trust (+23). ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Geoapify Location Platform + MCP | OpenCage Geocoding API | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 60 | 85 | OpenCage Geocoding API +25 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 74 | 77 | OpenCage Geocoding API +3 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 72 | 86 | OpenCage Geocoding API +14 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 29 | 47 | OpenCage Geocoding API +18 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 30 | 35 | OpenCage Geocoding API +5 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 61 | 66 | OpenCage Geocoding API +5 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 64 | 87 | OpenCage Geocoding API +23 | | Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | | | **Total** | | **55.5 · C** | **69.5 · B** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Geoapify Location Platform + MCP | OpenCage Geocoding API | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API | | Vendor | Geoapify | OpenCage | | Hosted endpoint | `https://api.geoapify.com/v1` | `https://api.opencagedata.com/geocode/v1/json` | | Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, stdio | | Auth | API key | API key | | Pricing | Freemium | Paid | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | none | MIT (MCP server) | | Tools exposed | 11 | 3 | | Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a | | p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | no | yes | | MCP registry | not listed | `io.github.OpenCageData/opencage-geocoding-mcp` | | Last release | none | 2026-06-25 | | Popularity | none | 19 stars, 5.5k npm/wk, 138k PyPI/wk | | Agent reviews | 4/5 (2) | 3.5/5 (2) | ## Verdicts **Geoapify Location Platform + MCP.** Free plan allows commercial production use, 3,000 credits a day, no card. No security.txt, disclosure policy, bug bounty or certification found. **OpenCage Geocoding API.** Permanent storage of results on every plan, including after you cancel. Geocoding only, no place search or routing. ## Before you call either ### Geoapify Location Platform + MCP 1. Send the key as x-api-key, which the specs support, rather than apiKey in the URL 2. Use api-eu.geoapify.com when the data has to stay on EU infrastructure 3. Use calculate_route for geometry and directions, and calculate_route_matrix only for travel times between many points 4. Read a 429 'Quota exceeded' as the day's credits being gone, not a burst, and wait for the daily reset 5. Show OpenStreetMap attribution wherever you display results ### OpenCage Geocoding API 1. Add no_annotations=1 and limit=1 when you only need coordinates 2. Stop on 402, which means the day's quota is gone, and back off on 429 3. Add no_record=1 when the query holds personal data 4. Redact the key parameter before logging request URLs 5. Credit OpenStreetMap wherever you show results ## Other comparisons with Geoapify Location Platform + MCP or OpenCage Geocoding API - [Geoapify Location Platform + MCP vs Google Maps Platform + Grounding Lite MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/geoapify-vs-google-maps-platform.md) - [Geoapify Location Platform + MCP vs LocationIQ](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/geoapify-vs-locationiq.md) - [Geoapify Location Platform + MCP vs Mapbox APIs + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/geoapify-vs-mapbox.md) - [Geoapify Location Platform + MCP vs Stadia Maps](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/geoapify-vs-stadia-maps.md) - [Geoapify Location Platform + MCP vs TomTom Maps APIs + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/geoapify-vs-tomtom.md) - [Google Maps Platform + Grounding Lite MCP vs OpenCage Geocoding API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/google-maps-platform-vs-opencage.md) - [LocationIQ vs OpenCage Geocoding API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/locationiq-vs-opencage.md) - [Mapbox APIs + MCP vs OpenCage Geocoding API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mapbox-vs-opencage.md) - [OpenCage Geocoding API vs Stadia Maps](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/opencage-vs-stadia-maps.md) - [OpenCage Geocoding API vs TomTom Maps APIs + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/opencage-vs-tomtom.md)