# Gemma 4 E4B IT vs SmolLM3-3B (slim)

> Gemma 4 E4B IT scores 63.2 (B) to SmolLM3-3B's 61 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemma-4-e4b-it-vs-smollm3-3b.md (~5,950 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemma-4-e4b-it-vs-smollm3-3b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemma-4-e4b-it-vs-smollm3-3b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Gemma 4 E4B IT scores 63.2 (B) on agent readiness against SmolLM3-3B's 61 (C), and leads in every scored category. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Gemma 4 E4B IT: B 63.2, rank #24 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/gemma-4-e4b-it.min.md
- SmolLM3-3B: C 61, rank #47 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/smollm3-3b.min.md
- Gemma 4 E4B IT, good for Agents that need a cheap, permissively licensed helper on 8 GB of memory, for tool calls, short audio or images, rather than hard reasoning Ahead on Reach, 95 against 85; Risk, 70 against 65; Agent interface, 85 against 80; Documentation and upkeep, 75 against 54.
- SmolLM3-3B, good for Agents that want a small, fully transparent tool-calling cousin on a laptop, CPU or edge device

| Category | Gemma 4 E4B IT | SmolLM3-3B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 95 | 85 |
| Risk (20%) | 70 | 65 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 85 | 80 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 75 | 54 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Gemma 4 E4B IT | SmolLM3-3B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Google DeepMind | Hugging Face |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-20 | 2025-09-10 |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | 3.3/5 (4) |