# Gemma 4 E4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B (slim)

> Gemma 4 E4B IT scores 63.2 (B) to MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B's 61 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemma-4-e4b-it-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-1b.md (~9,450 tokens) · this version ~630 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemma-4-e4b-it-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-1b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemma-4-e4b-it-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-1b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Gemma 4 E4B IT scores 63.2 (B) on agent readiness against MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B's 61 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Gemma 4 E4B IT: B 63.2, rank #24 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/gemma-4-e4b-it.min.md
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B: C 61, rank #76 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/minicpm-v-4-7-1b.min.md
- Gemma 4 E4B IT, good for Agents that need a cheap, permissively licensed helper on 8 GB of memory, for tool calls, short audio or images, rather than hard reasoning Ahead on Risk, 70 against 55; Agent interface, 85 against 70; Documentation and upkeep, 75 against 48.
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B, good for Agents that need a cheap local model to read screenshots, photos and short video on a phone, a laptop or beside a bigger model

| Category | Gemma 4 E4B IT | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 95 | 95 |
| Risk (20%) | 70 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 85 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 75 | 48 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Gemma 4 E4B IT | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Google DeepMind | OpenBMB |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-20 | 2026-10-30 |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | none |

Why the edge:
- Documentation and upkeep, Gemma 4 E4B IT +27: Gemma 4 E4B IT 75 (Model card 20, all seven items are there.); MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 48 (Model card 8, Intended use (image, multi-image and video understanding on device), architecture (early visual-token compression inside the vision encoder) and p…)
- Risk, Gemma 4 E4B IT +15: Gemma 4 E4B IT 70 (File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only, with nothing from the repository run on load.); MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 55 (File safety 25, safetensors in the main repository and the AWQ, GPTQ and int4 builds, GGUF in the GGUF build, with no .bin, .pt, .pth or .py files in the main r…)
- Agent interface, Gemma 4 E4B IT +15: Gemma 4 E4B IT 85 (Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository.); MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 70 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository, 7,249 characters.)