# Gemma 4 E2B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B (slim)

> MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B and Gemma 4 E2B IT score within a point of each other for open-weight models you run yourself, 61 and 60.4 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemma-4-e2b-it-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-1b.md (~9,400 tokens) · this version ~680 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemma-4-e2b-it-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-1b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemma-4-e2b-it-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-1b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B and Gemma 4 E2B IT score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 60.4 (C). Gemma 4 E2B IT leads on risk, agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Gemma 4 E2B IT: C 60.4, rank #88 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/gemma-4-e2b-it.min.md
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B: C 61, rank #76 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/minicpm-v-4-7-1b.min.md
- Gemma 4 E2B IT, good for Agents that need a cheap, permissively licensed helper on 8 GB of memory, for tool calls, short audio or images, rather than hard reasoning Ahead on Risk, 70 against 55; Agent interface, 85 against 70; Documentation and upkeep, 75 against 48.
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B, good for Agents that need a cheap local model to read screenshots, photos and short video on a phone, a laptop or beside a bigger model

| Category | Gemma 4 E2B IT | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 95 | 95 |
| Risk (20%) | 70 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 85 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 75 | 48 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Gemma 4 E2B IT | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Google DeepMind | OpenBMB |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-11-03 | 2026-10-30 |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (4) | none |

Why the edge:
- Documentation and upkeep, Gemma 4 E2B IT +27: Gemma 4 E2B IT 75 (Model card 20, all seven items are there.); MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 48 (Model card 8, Intended use (image, multi-image and video understanding on device), architecture (early visual-token compression inside the vision encoder) and p…)
- Risk, Gemma 4 E2B IT +15: Gemma 4 E2B IT 70 (File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only, with nothing from the repository run on load.); MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 55 (File safety 25, safetensors in the main repository and the AWQ, GPTQ and int4 builds, GGUF in the GGUF build, with no .bin, .pt, .pth or .py files in the main r…)
- Agent interface, Gemma 4 E2B IT +15: Gemma 4 E2B IT 85 (Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository.); MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 70 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository, 7,249 characters.)