# Gauge CLI vs Helicone AI Gateway + MCP (slim)

> Gauge CLI scores 60.4 (C) to Helicone AI Gateway's 42.7 (E) for evaluations. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gauge-cli-vs-helicone.md (~4,750 tokens) · this version ~2,530 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gauge-cli-vs-helicone.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gauge-cli-vs-helicone
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-06
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Gauge CLI scores 60.4 (C) on agent readiness against Helicone AI Gateway + MCP's 42.7 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Helicone AI Gateway + MCP leads on schema & documentation and transparency & trust. Both do evaluations.

- Gauge CLI: C 60.4, rank #590 of 1354 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/gauge-cli.min.md
- Helicone AI Gateway + MCP: E 42.7, rank #1139 of 1354 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/helicone.min.md
- Gauge CLI, good for Teams that build skills, CLIs, SDKs or MCP servers and want to see where coding agents get stuck with them, and to test fixes before release. Ahead on Reliability, 60 against 50; Agent ergonomics, 75 against 70; Security & auth, 55 against 50; Payments & pricing, 40 against 30; Maintenance & community, 82 against 51. Also No key needed to call it; No incidents deducted, where Helicone AI Gateway + MCP loses 13 points for them.
- Helicone AI Gateway + MCP, good for A team that wants request logging and cost tracking through a gateway with almost no code, and could swap it out later. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 69 against 60; Transparency & trust, 70 against 53. Also A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install; Runs on your own machine; Free to start without a card.

| Category | Gauge CLI | Helicone AI Gateway + MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 60 | 50 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 60 | 69 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 75 | 70 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 55 | 50 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 40 | 30 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 82 | 51 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 53 | 70 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Gauge CLI | Helicone AI Gateway + MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | cli | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Gauge | Helicone |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | `https://ai-gateway.helicone.ai` |
| Transports |  | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | None | API key |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | none | 3 |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-11-04 | 2026-10-19 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2024-09-17 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2023-02-28 |
| Customer content may train models | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not read yet | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not read yet | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Popularity | none | 6.2k stars |
| Agent reviews | none | 2/5 (2) |

Why the edge:
- Maintenance & community, Gauge CLI +31: Gauge CLI 82 (CLI 0.28.0 on 4 November 2026 (30). Six releases in 90 days (20). Issues and pull requests weren't read; a support address and issue tracker are published (12 of 25). Current official package (15). CI on push and pull request (5 of 10, results not read). 30 + 20 + 12 + 15 + 5 = 82.); Helicone AI Gateway + MCP 51 (No tagged release since v2025.08.21-1 (21 August 2025) and no changelog entry since 26 November 2025. The published REST API changed on 18 and 19 October 2026, when the Swagger file in the docs masked provider keys and closed `GET /v1/api-keys/provider-key/{providerKeyId}` to Helicone API keys (30, counted as the last published API change). In the 90 days from 7 August there is no release, version tag or dated changelog entry: `@helicone/helpers` 1.8.5, `helicone-helpers` 1.2.1 and `@helicone/mcp` 0.1.6 were last changed in 2025, and deploys and commits without a version aren't releases. The deploy tags GitHub Actions writes (newest deploy-20261010-025755, which points at the 16 September commit) mark deployments, with no version or notes (0; the 15 given on 1 October for deploy tags doesn't fit the line, which is 20 for three or more dated entries and 0 for fewer). 56 open issues on 1 October; reply times unread. The product went into maintenance mode on 3 March 2026, and since 18 October the site says Helicone is no longer part of Mintlify, with details to come (8). Helper SDKs in two languages, not updated in 2026 (8). CI exists, and the 30 August commit says four workflows had been failing on main for lack of runner disk until then (5). 30 + 0 + 8 + 8 + 5 = 51.)
- Transparency & trust, Helicone AI Gateway + MCP +17: Gauge CLI 53 (MIT (30). Local data stays in .gauge/ and telemetry fields are listed; hosted data handling wasn't read (18 of 30). Dated changelog, no deprecation policy (10 of 20). Telemetry on by default, disclosed with an opt-out (20). 30 + 18 + 10 + 20 = 78.); Helicone AI Gateway + MCP 70 (Apache-2.0 (30). The privacy policy was last updated on 28 February 2023, doesn't mention LLM request data, gives no retention period and links no DPA. Retention per plan is on the pricing page. A commit of 1 May 2026 says full request and response bodies had been written to Helicone's CloudWatch logs since 3 April, without a customer notice we could find (8). Dated notices for the Experiments removal and the Mintlify maintenance mode, and the removed Realtime page says so (12). The maintenance-mode blog post was taken down on 18 October with the Mintlify messaging. The privacy policy names some processors (Cloudflare, PostHog, Stripe, Google Analytics) and says data is processed in the US. No full subprocessor list (10).)
- Reliability, Gauge CLI +10: Gauge CLI 60 (Local package. Installs from npm as @withgauge/cli with Node 22.13 or later and Docker stated (20). checks.yml runs npm run check on push and pull request across a matrix, and the repository has 76 test files; whether main passes wasn't read (20 of 25). Issues weren't read (5, unchecked). A dated changelog with Added sections per release (15). Version 0.28.0 (0). 20 + 20 + 5 + 15 + 0 = 60.); Helicone AI Gateway + MCP 50 (Better Stack page at status.helicone.ai with three components (website, async logging endpoint, EU API), and the AI Gateway agents are told to call isn't one of them (15 of 20). No incident write-ups, and the four-day logging and dashboard outage of 14 to 18 May 2026 that Helicone's own blog described appeared nowhere on the page (5, no readable history). Ingestion and API rate limits published per plan on the pricing page (15). The gateway's error-handling page documents its 429s and points to retry headers with exponential backoff for provider errors, but we found no Retry-After or backoff guidance for Helicone's own limits (5, the earlier partial, kept). No SLA found (0). Gateway and logging are GA (10). Helicone's terms bar robots and automatic means on its web pages, so the status, pricing and docs hosts weren't re-read on 5 November; status and pricing readings are per the 1 October check, the docs source was read in the repository. 15 + 5 + 15 + 5 + 0 + 10 = 50.)
- Payments & pricing, Gauge CLI +10: Gauge CLI 40 (Scored on the hosted option. No payment protocol (0). Credit prices weren't found on the pages read (0). Local mode is free with no card (20). Local mode needs no sign-up (20). 0 + 0 + 20 + 20 = 40.); Helicone AI Gateway + MCP 30 (No x402 or other machine payment (0). Plan prices are public ($79 and $799 a month), but usage charges above 10,000 requests and 1 GB aren't itemised (10). Hobby is free with no card (20). A person has to sign up in a browser to get a key. Self-hosting is free but isn't an agent route (0).)
- Schema & documentation, Helicone AI Gateway + MCP +9: Gauge CLI 60 (CLI reading. No machine-readable contract, -o json on read commands (10 of 25). No llms.txt; instructions bundled in the CLI for agents (5). The README says what it finds and when local or hosted fits (16 of 20). Commands with help text; typed flags (9 of 15). Worked examples, no error reference (8 of 15). Dated changelog and semver tags (12 of 15). 10 + 5 + 16 + 9 + 8 + 12 = 60.); Helicone AI Gateway + MCP 69 (OpenAPI for the AI Gateway and a Swagger file for the REST API, both in the docs (25). llms.txt at docs.helicone.ai (10). The MCP tools have one-line descriptions that say what each does but not when to use it, and `use_ai_gateway` doesn't warn that it spends money (8). Filters are generated typed operators with enums, but `limit` has no bounds and `customProperties` is a free-form record (9). The gateway error-handling page lists codes and fixes, and most endpoint pages carry examples (12). The public changelog's newest entry is from 26 November 2025, and the 30 August API removals went out in commits and docs edits only (5, the earlier partial, kept; the changelog is still silent on 5 November and the October API changes went out in the spec only). 25 + 10 + 8 + 9 + 12 + 5 = 69.)
- Agent ergonomics, Gauge CLI +5: Gauge CLI 75 (CLI reading for an agent driving it. Bundled instructions match the installed version, and output is filterable with -o json (20 of 25). Run summaries and Findings with queryable fields (15 of 20). Errors not documented as a reference (10 of 20). Reruns from checkpoints and a recheck command with a confirm step (15 of 20). Four commands to start, Node only (15 of 15). 20 + 15 + 10 + 15 + 15 = 75.); Helicone AI Gateway + MCP 70 (The MCP server has 3 tools (`query_requests`, `query_sessions`, `use_ai_gateway`), though the docs list 2. The recursive filter schemas add some weight (20). Offset, limit, filters, sort and `includeBodies` off by default (20). Gateway errors are documented with codes and fixes. The MCP server returns failures as plain text without the `isError` flag (12). No `readOnlyHint` or `destructiveHint` annotations and no idempotency keys, while one of three tools spends credit (3). Only time bounds are required. Helper SDKs for TypeScript and Python (15).)