# FullEnrich API + MCP vs People Data Labs > People Data Labs scores 64.2 (B) on agent readiness against FullEnrich API + MCP's 59.6 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. FullEnrich API + MCP leads on security & auth and payments & pricing. Both do lead search. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by… - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullenrich-vs-people-data-labs - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullenrich-vs-people-data-labs.md (~2,500 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullenrich-vs-people-data-labs.min.md (~730 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullenrich-vs-people-data-labs.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-09 People Data Labs scores 64.2 (B) on agent readiness against FullEnrich API + MCP's 59.6 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. FullEnrich API + MCP leads on security & auth and payments & pricing. Both do lead search. - FullEnrich API + MCP: grade C, 59.6/100, rank #491 of 842. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/fullenrich.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/fullenrich.json - People Data Labs: grade B, 64.2/100, rank #326 of 842. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/people-data-labs.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/people-data-labs.json ## Which one, for what ### FullEnrich API + MCP (C) Good for: Maximising find rate on known contacts, especially mobiles, without a long-term contract. Ahead on: - Security & auth, 55 against 43 - Payments & pricing, 40 against 35 Also in its favour: - Free to start without a card Watch for: Enrichment sources are third-party providers the vendor doesn't name ### People Data Labs (B) Good for: Products and pipelines that enrich or search person and company records at volume and can write Elasticsearch or SQL queries. Ahead on: - Reliability, 78 against 60 - Agent ergonomics, 77 against 60 - Maintenance & community, 79 against 68 Watch for: No OpenAPI file was found. The machine-readable material is a Postman collection and Elasticsearch mappings ## Score by category | Category | Weight | FullEnrich API + MCP | People Data Labs | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 60 | 78 | People Data Labs +18 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 72 | 70 | FullEnrich API + MCP +2 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 60 | 77 | People Data Labs +17 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 55 | 43 | FullEnrich API + MCP +12 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 40 | 35 | FullEnrich API + MCP +5 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 68 | 79 | People Data Labs +11 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 64 | 67 | People Data Labs +3 | | Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | | | **Total** | | **59.6 · C** | **64.2 · B** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | FullEnrich API + MCP | People Data Labs | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API | | Vendor | FullEnrich | People Data Labs, Inc. | | Hosted endpoint | `https://app.fullenrich.com/api/v2` | `https://api.peopledatalabs.com/v5` | | Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP | | Auth | OAuth or key | API key | | Pricing | Freemium | Freemium | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | none | Proprietary service under the Services Subscription Agreement. The Python and JavaScript SDKs are MIT | | Tools exposed | 13 | none | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | yes | yes | | MCP registry | `io.github.FullEnrich/fullenrich` | not listed | | Last release | 2026-08-27 | 2026-09-16 | | Terms last updated | 2026-08-20 | couldn't be read | | Privacy policy last updated | 2026-08-20 | couldn't be read | | Customer content may train models | not found in the text | couldn't be read | | Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | couldn't be read | | Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | couldn't be read | | Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | couldn't be read | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | couldn't be read | | Popularity | none | 40 stars, 133k npm/wk, 30k PyPI/wk | | Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | none | ## Verdicts **FullEnrich API + MCP.** Credits only spent on found data, and identical re-runs within 3 months are free. Enrichment sources are third-party providers the vendor doesn't name. **People Data Labs.** Monthly dated release notes, a free sandbox with synthetic data, response headers that report credits and rate limits, and a free plan of 100 records a month make the API easy to start with. No OpenAPI file was found, keys carry no scopes and may travel in the URL, and the agreement allows changes without notice. ## Before you call either ### FullEnrich API + MCP 1. Send identical names, domains and LinkedIn URLs when re-running, or deduplication misses and you pay again 2. Expect 30 to 90 seconds a contact. Use the webhook or poll `get_enrichment_results` 3. Ask for mobiles only when needed. They cost 10 credits against 1 for a work email 4. Call `list_industries` and `list_seniorities` before filtering search 5. Use the 0-credit test contacts in the docs to check an integration ### People Data Labs 1. Send the key in the `X-Api-Key` header. The `api_key` query parameter puts the secret in URLs and logs 2. Build and test queries against `https://sandbox.api.peopledatalabs.com/v5/...` first. It costs no credits and allows five calls a minute 3. Set `size` deliberately on search. Every record returned costs one credit, and responses over 1 MB fail 4. Treat `404` on enrichment as no match, not an error, and `402` as credits exhausted. Neither is worth a retry 5. On `429`, wait until the `x-ratelimit-reset` time. Limits are fixed-window per key and per endpoint ## Questions ### Which is better for AI agents, FullEnrich API + MCP or People Data Labs? People Data Labs scores 64.2 (B) on agent readiness against FullEnrich API + MCP's 59.6 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. FullEnrich API + MCP leads on security & auth and payments & pricing. ### Do FullEnrich API + MCP and People Data Labs need an API key? FullEnrich API + MCP takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in. People Data Labs needs an API key. ### Can an agent call FullEnrich API + MCP and People Data Labs without installing anything? Yes. FullEnrich API + MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://app.fullenrich.com/api/v2 and People Data Labs at https://api.peopledatalabs.com/v5. ## For agents - This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullenrich-vs-people-data-labs.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullenrich-vs-people-data-labs.min.md - Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "fullenrich", "b": "people-data-labs"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare fullenrich people-data-labs` - Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/fullenrich.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/people-data-labs.json ## Other comparisons with FullEnrich API + MCP or People Data Labs - [Apollo API + MCP vs FullEnrich API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apollo-vs-fullenrich.md) - [Apollo API + MCP vs People Data Labs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apollo-vs-people-data-labs.md) - [Coresignal API + MCP vs FullEnrich API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-fullenrich.md) - [Coresignal API + MCP vs People Data Labs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-people-data-labs.md) - [Crustdata API + MCP vs FullEnrich API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crustdata-vs-fullenrich.md) - [Crustdata API + MCP vs People Data Labs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crustdata-vs-people-data-labs.md) - [Enrich Layer API + MCP vs FullEnrich API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/enrich-layer-vs-fullenrich.md) - [Enrich Layer API + MCP vs People Data Labs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/enrich-layer-vs-people-data-labs.md) - [FullEnrich API + MCP vs Fuse MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullenrich-vs-fuse-mcp.md) - [FullEnrich API + MCP vs Gojiberry](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullenrich-vs-gojiberry.md) - [FullEnrich API + MCP vs Hunter API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullenrich-vs-hunter.md) - [FullEnrich API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullenrich-vs-leadmagic.md) - [FullEnrich API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullenrich-vs-lusha.md) - [FullEnrich API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullenrich-vs-prospeo.md) - [FullEnrich API + MCP vs ZoomInfo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullenrich-vs-zoominfo.md) - [Fuse MCP vs People Data Labs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fuse-mcp-vs-people-data-labs.md) - [Gojiberry vs People Data Labs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gojiberry-vs-people-data-labs.md) - [Hunter API + MCP vs People Data Labs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hunter-vs-people-data-labs.md) - [LeadMagic API + MCP vs People Data Labs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/leadmagic-vs-people-data-labs.md) - [Lusha API + MCP vs People Data Labs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lusha-vs-people-data-labs.md) - [People Data Labs vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/people-data-labs-vs-prospeo.md) - [People Data Labs vs ZoomInfo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/people-data-labs-vs-zoominfo.md) - [Dropcontact API + MCP vs FullEnrich API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dropcontact-vs-fullenrich.md) - [Dropcontact API + MCP vs People Data Labs](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dropcontact-vs-people-data-labs.md)