# Formbricks vs Jotform (slim)

> Formbricks scores 57.7 (C) on agent readiness against Jotform's 52.9 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Jotform leads on reliability and agent ergonomics. Both do forms surveys. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/formbricks-vs-jotform.md (~2,250 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/formbricks-vs-jotform.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/formbricks-vs-jotform
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-08

Formbricks scores 57.7 (C) on agent readiness against Jotform's 52.9 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Jotform leads on reliability and agent ergonomics. Both do forms surveys.

- Formbricks: C 57.7, rank #465 of 722 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/formbricks.min.md
- Jotform: D 52.9, rank #556 of 722 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/jotform.min.md
- Formbricks, good for Teams that want survey data in the EU or on their own servers, with an agent creating link, website and in-app surveys and reading responses under a workspace-limited key. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 74 against 30; Security & auth, 69 against 56; Maintenance & community, 83 against 25; Transparency & trust, 78 against 68. Also Open source.
- Jotform, good for An owner who already keeps forms in Jotform and wants an agent to build forms, read submissions and register webhooks, including EU and HIPAA accounts on their own hosts. Ahead on Reliability, 83 against 35; Agent ergonomics, 60 against 54.

| Category | Formbricks | Jotform |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 35 | 83 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 74 | 30 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 54 | 60 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 69 | 56 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 30 | 30 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 83 | 25 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 78 | 68 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Formbricks | Jotform |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Formbricks GmbH | Jotform Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://app.formbricks.com/api` | `https://api.jotform.com` |
| Licence | AGPLv3 for the core. Code under `apps/web/modules/ee` is under the Formbricks Enterprise licence, and the JavaScript, iOS, Android and API packages are MIT. Formbricks Cloud is governed by the terms of service | Proprietary service under Jotform's terms of use. The MCP server repository (docs and a Gemini CLI extension, no server code) and the Node client are MIT |
| Tools exposed | 30 | 6 |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | `com.jotform/mcp` |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-02-26 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-08-21 | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | yes |
| Popularity | 13k stars, 37k npm/wk | 3.6k npm/wk |