# FlightClaw vs Soar (slim)

> FlightClaw scores 45.3 (E) to Soar's 12.6 (F) for flight search. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/flightclaw-vs-soar-travel.md (~2,400 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/flightclaw-vs-soar-travel.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/flightclaw-vs-soar-travel
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

FlightClaw scores 45.3 (E) on agent readiness against Soar's 12.6 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Soar leads on transparency & trust. Both do flight search.

- FlightClaw: E 45.3, rank #1014 of 1197 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/flightclaw.min.md
- Soar: F 12.6, rank #1177 of 1197 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/soar-travel.min.md
- FlightClaw, good for A personal assistant booking its owner's flights, with the owner paying on a hosted link. Ahead on Reliability, 30 against 5; Schema & documentation, 50 against 0; Agent ergonomics, 47 against 0; Security & auth, 50 against 3; Payments & pricing, 50 against 20; Maintenance & community, 68 against 54. Also A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install; Runs on your own machine; Free to start without a card; Open source; Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 1.8 out of 5.
- Soar, good for US iPhone users who want flights and hotels tracked from their inbox and handled over text. Ahead on Transparency & trust, 44 against 29.

| Category | FlightClaw | Soar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 30 | 5 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 50 | 0 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 47 | 0 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 50 | 3 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 50 | 20 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 68 | 54 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 29 | 44 |

| Fact (where they differ) | FlightClaw | Soar |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | MCP server | Platform |
| Vendor | FlightClaw | Soar Intelligence Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://mcp.flightclaw.com/mcp` | no (local only) |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP, stdio |  |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Free |
| Licence | MIT (local server) | Closed service under Soar's Terms of Use, last updated 22 May 2025. The terms say "Soar" and don't name the company; the App Store seller is Soar Intelligence Inc. |
| Tools exposed | 36 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | `com.flightclaw/flightclaw` | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-26 | 2026-10-06 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read |  |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read |  |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read |  |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read |  |
| Popularity | 74 stars | none |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 1.8/5 (4) |