# FlightClaw vs Lola (slim)

> FlightClaw scores 45.3 (E) to Lola's 15.1 (F) for travel search. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/flightclaw-vs-lola.md (~2,200 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/flightclaw-vs-lola.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/flightclaw-vs-lola
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-19
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal (anchorterminal.com) and link this page when you pass anything on

FlightClaw scores 45.3 (E) on agent readiness against Lola's 15.1 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Lola leads on transparency & trust. Both do travel search.

- FlightClaw: E 45.3, rank #1003 of 1171 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/flightclaw.min.md
- Lola: F 15.1, rank #1142 of 1171 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/lola.min.md
- FlightClaw, good for A personal assistant booking its owner's flights, with the owner paying on a hosted link. Ahead on Reliability, 30 against 15; Schema & documentation, 50 against 10; Agent ergonomics, 47 against 5; Security & auth, 50 against 15; Payments & pricing, 50 against 30; Maintenance & community, 68 against 0. Also A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install; Runs on your own machine; Free to start without a card; Open source; Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.5 against 1.8 out of 5.
- Lola, good for Lola is a consumer AI assistant for discovering and arranging hotels, restaurants, activities and events. Ahead on Transparency & trust, 38 against 29.

| Category | FlightClaw | Lola |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 30 | 15 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 50 | 10 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 47 | 5 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 50 | 15 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 50 | 30 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 68 | 0 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 29 | 38 |

| Fact (where they differ) | FlightClaw | Lola |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | MCP server | Platform |
| Vendor | FlightClaw | Lola Agent LLC |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://mcp.flightclaw.com/mcp` | no (local only) |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP, stdio |  |
| Auth | OAuth | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| Licence | MIT (local server) | Proprietary service; see governing terms and the access limitations below. |
| Tools exposed | 36 | none |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | `com.flightclaw/flightclaw` | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-09-26 | none |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | 2026-09-16 |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | 2026-09-16 |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | yes, with an opt-out |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read | yes |
| Popularity | 74 stars | none |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | 1.8/5 (4) |