# Firecrawl MCP vs ZenRows (slim)

> Firecrawl MCP has a score of 75.5 (BB) against ZenRows's 75.1 (BB). Both do extraction. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 30 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-zenrows.md (~1,950 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-zenrows.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-zenrows
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

Firecrawl MCP has a score of 75.5 (BB) against ZenRows's 75.1 (BB). Both do extraction. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 30 points.

- Firecrawl MCP: BB 75.5, rank #34 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/firecrawl-mcp.min.md
- ZenRows: BB 75.1, rank #43 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/zenrows.min.md
- Pick Firecrawl MCP for schema & documentation (+5), agent ergonomics (+13), security & auth (+26). Pick ZenRows for reliability (+17), payments & pricing (+30).

| Category | Firecrawl MCP | ZenRows |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 70 | 87 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 88 | 83 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 92 | 79 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 67 | 41 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 50 | 80 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 87 | 87 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 76 | 75 |