# Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapingBee (slim)

> Firecrawl MCP has a score of 75.5 (BB) against ScrapingBee's 59.3 (C). Both do web search. The largest gap is security & auth, 30 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapingbee.md (~2,000 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapingbee.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapingbee
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

Firecrawl MCP has a score of 75.5 (BB) against ScrapingBee's 59.3 (C). Both do web search. The largest gap is security & auth, 30 points.

- Firecrawl MCP: BB 75.5, rank #34 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/firecrawl-mcp.min.md
- ScrapingBee: C 59.3, rank #268 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/scrapingbee.min.md
- Pick Firecrawl MCP for schema & documentation (+28), agent ergonomics (+24), security & auth (+30), payments & pricing (+10), transparency & trust (+12). Pick ScrapingBee for nothing in particular.

| Category | Firecrawl MCP | ScrapingBee |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 70 | 70 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 88 | 60 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 92 | 68 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 67 | 37 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 50 | 40 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 87 | 85 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 76 | 64 |