# Firecrawl MCP vs ScrapeGraphAI (slim)

> Firecrawl MCP has a score of 75.5 (BB) against ScrapeGraphAI's 68.3 (B). Both do web search. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 40 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapegraphai.md (~2,050 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapegraphai.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-scrapegraphai
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

Firecrawl MCP has a score of 75.5 (BB) against ScrapeGraphAI's 68.3 (B). Both do web search. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 40 points.

- Firecrawl MCP: BB 75.5, rank #34 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/firecrawl-mcp.min.md
- ScrapeGraphAI: B 68.3, rank #128 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/scrapegraphai.min.md
- Pick Firecrawl MCP for reliability (+6), agent ergonomics (+20), security & auth (+28), maintenance & community (+17), transparency & trust (+15). Pick ScrapeGraphAI for payments & pricing (+40).

| Category | Firecrawl MCP | ScrapeGraphAI |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 70 | 64 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 88 | 88 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 92 | 72 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 67 | 39 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 50 | 90 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 87 | 70 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 76 | 61 |