# Firecrawl MCP vs Oxylabs Web Scraper API (slim)

> Firecrawl MCP scores 75.3 (BB) on agent readiness against Oxylabs Web Scraper API's 63 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Oxylabs Web Scraper API leads on reliability. Both do extraction. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-oxylabs-web-scraper.md (~3,000 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-oxylabs-web-scraper.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/firecrawl-mcp-vs-oxylabs-web-scraper
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09

Firecrawl MCP scores 75.3 (BB) on agent readiness against Oxylabs Web Scraper API's 63 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Oxylabs Web Scraper API leads on reliability. Both do extraction.

- Firecrawl MCP: BB 75.3, rank #49 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/firecrawl-mcp.min.md
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API: B 63, rank #372 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/oxylabs-web-scraper.min.md
- Firecrawl MCP, good for Agents that need the whole pipeline (find URLs, scrape to markdown, crawl, monitor) from one server, and for trying without an account. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 88 against 68; Agent ergonomics, 92 against 79; Security & auth, 67 against 53; Payments & pricing, 50 against 40; Maintenance & community, 87 against 72; Transparency & trust, 74 against 63. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better; Open source; No incidents deducted, where Oxylabs Web Scraper API loses 3 points for them.
- Oxylabs Web Scraper API, good for Agents that need parsed Google, Amazon and other large-site results or bulk asynchronous jobs through one API. Ahead on Reliability, 80 against 70. Also Free to start without a card.

| Category | Firecrawl MCP | Oxylabs Web Scraper API |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 70 | 80 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 88 | 68 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 92 | 79 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 67 | 53 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 50 | 40 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 87 | 72 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 74 | 63 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Firecrawl MCP | Oxylabs Web Scraper API |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | MCP server | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Firecrawl (Mendable) | oxylabs, UAB |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://mcp.firecrawl.dev/v2/mcp` | `https://realtime.oxylabs.io/v1/queries` |
| Transports | stdio, Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| Licence | MIT | Proprietary service under the Oxylabs General Conditions. The MCP server and the Python SDK on GitHub are MIT |
| Tools exposed | 26 | 10 |
| MCP registry | `io.github.firecrawl/firecrawl-mcp-server` | `io.oxylabs/oxylabs-mcp` |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-09-07 |
| Terms last updated | 2024-11-05 | 2026-10-05 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2024-12-26 | 2024-10-14 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 7.5k stars, 29k npm/wk | 18k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (8) | none |