# Financial Cents MCP vs Redmine

> Redmine scores 50.2 (D) to Financial Cents MCP's 39.7 (E) for issues and tasks. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/financial-cents-mcp-vs-redmine
- Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/financial-cents-mcp-vs-redmine.md (~2,800 tokens)
- Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/financial-cents-mcp-vs-redmine.min.md (~680 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts)
- JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/financial-cents-mcp-vs-redmine.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json)
- Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt)
- API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json
- MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (the whole catalogue as tools, no key)
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)
- Updated: 2026-10-27

Redmine scores 50.2 (D) on agent readiness against Financial Cents MCP's 39.7 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Financial Cents MCP leads on schema & documentation, security & auth and transparency & trust. Both do issues and tasks.

- Financial Cents MCP: grade E, 39.7/100, rank #1093 of 1212. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/financial-cents-mcp.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/financial-cents-mcp.json
- Redmine: grade D, 50.2/100, rank #916 of 1212. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/redmine.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/redmine.json
- Best project and task management tools for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/project-management/index.md
- All 152 projects comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/project-management/index.md

## Which one, for what

### Financial Cents MCP (E)

Good for: Accounting, bookkeeping and tax firms on Financial Cents Scale who want an assistant to answer workload, billing and client questions and log time or create tasks.

Ahead on:
- Schema & documentation, 40 against 32
- Security & auth, 61 against 51
- Transparency & trust, 53 against 47

Also in its favour:
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- Free to start without a card

Watch for: One OAuth scope, `mcp:use`, covers reads and every write, including sending, charging and voiding invoices

### Redmine (D)

Good for: Teams that already run Redmine or want a free, self-hosted tracker with issues, time entries and wikis under their own control.

Ahead on:
- Reliability, 69 against 23
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 25
- Maintenance & community, 73 against 50

Also in its favour:
- Open source

Watch for: No OpenAPI document or other machine-readable contract was found in the wiki or the source repository


## Score by category

| Category | Weight | Financial Cents MCP | Redmine | Edge |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 23 | 69 | Redmine +46 |
| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 40 | 32 | Financial Cents MCP +8 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 48 | 51 | Redmine +3 |
| Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 61 | 51 | Financial Cents MCP +10 |
| Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 25 | 60 | Redmine +35 |
| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 50 | 73 | Redmine +23 |
| Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 53 | 47 | Financial Cents MCP +6 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | -4 | |
| **Total** | | **39.7 · E** | **50.2 · D** | |

## Facts side by side

| Fact | Financial Cents MCP | Redmine |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | MCP server | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Financial Cents LLC | Redmine project |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://app.financial-cents.com/mcp` | no (local only) |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary hosted service under Financial Cents' terms of use, which are hosted on iubenda and weren't read because iubenda's robots.txt disallows them. No source is public | GPL-2.0-or-later |
| Tools exposed | 40 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-05 | 2026-09-30 |
| Terms last updated |  | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated |  | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models |  |  |
| Terms restrict automated access |  |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking |  |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice |  |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver |  |  |

## Verdicts

**Financial Cents MCP.** The server gives assistants 40 tools over an accounting firm's Financial Cents data, under the user's own permissions and bound to one firm by OAuth. Tool descriptions are detailed and client chat is marked as untrusted. It can send and charge invoices with one undivided scope, and there's no status page, numeric MCP rate limit or readable tool schema.

**Redmine.** Redmine's REST API covers issues, projects, time entries and 20 other resources, and versions 6.1 and later add OAuth 2 with one scope per permission. The software is free under the GPL. No OpenAPI document exists, most errors return a bare status code, and 24 security advisories were published in twelve months, two rated critical.

## Before you call either

### Financial Cents MCP

1. Call `whoami` first and work out date windows from `user.timezone`, not `company.timezone`
2. Resolve clients and projects with `list_clients` or `list_projects` search, since `lookup` covers only reference data such as users, tags and service items
3. Check money units per tool. Invoices, payments, proposals and credit memos use integer cents, while time entries and service-item rates use dollars
4. Never retry a successful `invoice_actions`, `proposal_actions` or credit-memo create, since a second call can email or charge the client again
5. Get the person's approval before any write, and use `preview: true` before sending a proposal

### Redmine

1. Ask an administrator to tick Enable REST API under Administration, Settings, API. It is off by default and every call fails until then
2. Send the key in the `X-Redmine-API-Key` header, never as the `key` query parameter, and set `Content-Type: application/json` on every POST and PUT
3. Add `status_id=*` to issue lists. The default returns open issues only, 25 a page with a maximum of 100
4. Comment on an issue by sending `notes` in a PUT to `/issues/<id>.json`. There is no separate comment endpoint
5. A DELETE on a project through the API skips the confirmation the web page asks for, so run the agent as a non-administrator user

## Questions

### Which is better for AI agents, Financial Cents MCP or Redmine?

Redmine scores 50.2 (D) on agent readiness against Financial Cents MCP's 39.7 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Financial Cents MCP leads on schema & documentation, security & auth and transparency & trust.

### Do Financial Cents MCP and Redmine need an API key?

Financial Cents MCP uses an OAuth sign-in. Redmine takes an API key or an OAuth sign-in.

### Can an agent call Financial Cents MCP and Redmine without installing anything?

Financial Cents MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://app.financial-cents.com/mcp. No hosted endpoint is listed for Redmine.

### Are Financial Cents MCP and Redmine open source?

No open-source release is listed for Financial Cents MCP. Redmine is open source (GPL-2.0-or-later).


## For agents

- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/financial-cents-mcp-vs-redmine.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/financial-cents-mcp-vs-redmine.min.md
- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "financial-cents-mcp", "b": "redmine"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare financial-cents-mcp redmine`
- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/financial-cents-mcp.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/redmine.json

## Other comparisons with Financial Cents MCP or Redmine

- [Asana vs Financial Cents MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/asana-vs-financial-cents-mcp.md)
- [Asana vs Redmine](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/asana-vs-redmine.md)
- [Atlassian Rovo MCP Server vs Financial Cents MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/atlassian-rovo-mcp-vs-financial-cents-mcp.md)
- [Atlassian Rovo MCP Server vs Redmine](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/atlassian-rovo-mcp-vs-redmine.md)
- [Basecamp vs Financial Cents MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/basecamp-vs-financial-cents-mcp.md)
- [Basecamp vs Redmine](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/basecamp-vs-redmine.md)
- [ClickUp vs Financial Cents MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clickup-vs-financial-cents-mcp.md)
- [ClickUp vs Redmine](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clickup-vs-redmine.md)
- [Financial Cents MCP vs Linear MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/financial-cents-mcp-vs-linear-mcp.md)
- [Financial Cents MCP vs monday.com](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/financial-cents-mcp-vs-monday.md)
- [Financial Cents MCP vs OpenProject](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/financial-cents-mcp-vs-openproject.md)
- [Financial Cents MCP vs Plane](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/financial-cents-mcp-vs-plane.md)
- [Financial Cents MCP vs Roma](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/financial-cents-mcp-vs-roma.md)
- [Financial Cents MCP vs Shortcut](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/financial-cents-mcp-vs-shortcut.md)
- [Financial Cents MCP vs Taiga](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/financial-cents-mcp-vs-taiga.md)
- [Financial Cents MCP vs Teamwork.com](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/financial-cents-mcp-vs-teamwork.md)
- [Financial Cents MCP vs Todoist](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/financial-cents-mcp-vs-todoist.md)
- [Financial Cents MCP vs Trello](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/financial-cents-mcp-vs-trello.md)
- [Financial Cents MCP vs Wrike](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/financial-cents-mcp-vs-wrike.md)
- [Financial Cents MCP vs YouTrack](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/financial-cents-mcp-vs-youtrack.md)
- [Linear MCP vs Redmine](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/linear-mcp-vs-redmine.md)
- [monday.com vs Redmine](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/monday-vs-redmine.md)
- [OpenProject vs Redmine](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openproject-vs-redmine.md)
- [Plane vs Redmine](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/plane-vs-redmine.md)
- [Redmine vs Roma](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/redmine-vs-roma.md)
- [Redmine vs Shortcut](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/redmine-vs-shortcut.md)
- [Redmine vs Taiga](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/redmine-vs-taiga.md)
- [Redmine vs Teamwork.com](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/redmine-vs-teamwork.md)
- [Redmine vs Todoist](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/redmine-vs-todoist.md)
- [Redmine vs Trello](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/redmine-vs-trello.md)
- [Redmine vs Wrike](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/redmine-vs-wrike.md)
- [Redmine vs YouTrack](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/redmine-vs-youtrack.md)

---

Query this catalogue directly over MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (Streamable HTTP, no key). How: https://www.anchorterminal.com/agents/#mcp