# Fillout vs Jotform (slim)

> Jotform and Fillout score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 52.9 (D) and 52.2 (D). Fillout leads on schema & documentation and maintenance & community. Both do forms responses. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fillout-vs-jotform.md (~2,100 tokens) · this version ~680 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fillout-vs-jotform.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fillout-vs-jotform
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-08

Jotform and Fillout score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 52.9 (D) and 52.2 (D). Fillout leads on schema & documentation and maintenance & community. Both do forms responses.

- Fillout: D 52.2, rank #567 of 722 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/fillout.min.md
- Jotform: D 52.9, rank #556 of 722 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/jotform.min.md
- Fillout, good for An agent that reads form responses, files submissions on a person's behalf or subscribes a webhook to a form someone has already built. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 63 against 30; Maintenance & community, 46 against 25.
- Jotform, good for An owner who already keeps forms in Jotform and wants an agent to build forms, read submissions and register webhooks, including EU and HIPAA accounts on their own hosts. Ahead on Reliability, 83 against 70; Agent ergonomics, 60 against 47; Security & auth, 56 against 37.

| Category | Fillout | Jotform |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 70 | 83 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 63 | 30 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 47 | 60 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 37 | 56 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 30 | 30 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 46 | 25 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 69 | 68 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Fillout | Jotform |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Restly, Inc. (trading as Zite) | Jotform Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://api.fillout.com/v1/api` | `https://api.jotform.com` |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Price for forms responses | $15 per month (plan) | not published |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Fillout's terms of service. The TypeScript API client on GitHub is MIT | Proprietary service under Jotform's terms of use. The MCP server repository (docs and a Gemini CLI extension, no server code) and the Node client are MIT |
| Tools exposed | none | 6 |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | `com.jotform/mcp` |
| Last release | none | 2026-02-26 |
| Terms last updated | 2022-07-02 | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-10-07 | no date given |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 1.8k npm/wk | 3.6k npm/wk |