# Figma API + MCP vs Penpot API + MCP (slim)

> Figma API + MCP has a score of 66.1 (B) against Penpot API + MCP's 43.8 (E). Both do design files. The largest gap is security & auth, 41 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/figma-mcp-vs-penpot.md (~1,300 tokens) · this version ~380 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/figma-mcp-vs-penpot.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/figma-mcp-vs-penpot
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-04

Figma API + MCP has a score of 66.1 (B) against Penpot API + MCP's 43.8 (E). Both do design files. The largest gap is security & auth, 41 points.

- Figma API + MCP: B 66.1, rank #164 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/figma-mcp.min.md
- Penpot API + MCP: E 43.8, rank #408 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/penpot.min.md
- Pick Figma API + MCP for reliability (+13), schema & documentation (+20), agent ergonomics (+19), security & auth (+41), maintenance & community (+8), transparency & trust (+6). Pick Penpot API + MCP for nothing in particular.

| Category | Figma API + MCP | Penpot API + MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 59 | 46 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 86 | 66 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 60 | 41 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 74 | 33 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 30 | 30 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 84 | 76 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 75 | 69 |