# Fara1.5-27B vs Mage-VL-Cowork (slim)

> Fara1.5-27B and Mage-VL-Cowork score within a point of each other for desktop app control, 61 and 61 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fara1-5-27b-vs-mage-vl-cowork.md (~3,450 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fara1-5-27b-vs-mage-vl-cowork.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fara1-5-27b-vs-mage-vl-cowork
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Fara1.5-27B and Mage-VL-Cowork score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). Mage-VL-Cowork leads on reach and agent interface. Both do desktop app control.

- Fara1.5-27B: C 61, rank #62 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/fara1-5-27b.min.md
- Mage-VL-Cowork: C 61, rank #74 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mage-vl-cowork.min.md
- Fara1.5-27B, good for Developers building a supervised web-browsing agent who want open weights and clear safety behaviour Ahead on Risk, 75 against 65; Documentation and upkeep, 65 against 54.
- Mage-VL-Cowork, good for Agents with one GPU and a sandboxed Linux desktop that want a small local model to carry out office and file tasks by GUI and shell Ahead on Reach, 60 against 55; Agent interface, 85 against 80.

| Category | Fara1.5-27B | Mage-VL-Cowork |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 55 | 60 |
| Risk (20%) | 75 | 65 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 80 | 85 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 65 | 54 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Fara1.5-27B | Mage-VL-Cowork |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Licence | MIT | Apache 2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-07-27 | 2026-10-30 |

Why the edge:
- Documentation and upkeep, Fara1.5-27B +11: Fara1.5-27B 65 (Model card 20, Intended use, out-of-scope use and known limitations, the architecture, the parameters, the context, the language (English only) and the data cut…); Mage-VL-Cowork 54 (The card covers intended use, architecture, parameters, context and language, and misses limitations and a cut-off (14).)
- Risk, Fara1.5-27B +10: Fara1.5-27B 75 (File safety 25, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in the repository.); Mage-VL-Cowork 65 (File safety gets 15, safetensors only but loaded with trust_remote_code.)
- Reach, Mage-VL-Cowork +5: Fara1.5-27B 55 (Memory 10, the only build from Microsoft is the BF16 safetensors, 54.71 GB, and 54.71 GB × 1.2 = 65.7 GB, which fits the reference machine but not 64 GB.); Mage-VL-Cowork 60 (Memory earns the full 30, since the only build is 9.50 GB of BF16 files that need about 11.4 GB with the fifth added.)
- Agent interface, Mage-VL-Cowork +5: Fara1.5-27B 80 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (7,756 characters), Qwen 3.5's template.); Mage-VL-Cowork 85 (Read for a computer-use model, the tool-calling, trained tool calling and structured-output lines stand for what it takes and returns.)