# Extend API + MCP vs LlamaParse API + MCP (slim)

> Extend API + MCP has a score of 62.9 (B) against LlamaParse API + MCP's 59.6 (C). Both do docs parse. The largest gap is reliability, 12 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/extend-vs-llamaparse.md (~1,550 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/extend-vs-llamaparse.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/extend-vs-llamaparse
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

Extend API + MCP has a score of 62.9 (B) against LlamaParse API + MCP's 59.6 (C). Both do docs parse. The largest gap is reliability, 12 points.

- Extend API + MCP: B 62.9, rank #211 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/extend.min.md
- LlamaParse API + MCP: C 59.6, rank #262 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/llamaparse.min.md
- Pick Extend API + MCP for reliability (+12), schema & documentation (+5). Pick LlamaParse API + MCP for security & auth (+5), payments & pricing (+10).

| Category | Extend API + MCP | LlamaParse API + MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 67 | 55 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 87 | 82 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 68 | 72 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 43 | 48 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 30 | 40 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 82 | 80 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 67 | 70 |