# Expo Push Notifications vs Pingram (slim)

> Expo Push Notifications scores 58.8 (C) to Pingram's 57.4 (C) for push notifications. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/expo-push-notifications-vs-pingram.md (~2,400 tokens) · this version ~680 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/expo-push-notifications-vs-pingram.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/expo-push-notifications-vs-pingram
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09

Expo Push Notifications scores 58.8 (C) on agent readiness against Pingram's 57.4 (C), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Pingram leads on schema & documentation and maintenance & community. Both do push notifications.

- Expo Push Notifications: C 58.8, rank #571 of 950 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/expo-push-notifications.min.md
- Pingram: C 57.4, rank #611 of 950 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/pingram.min.md
- Expo Push Notifications, good for An agent that must push to an app already built with Expo, at no cost and with one call for both platforms. Ahead on Reliability, 65 against 58; Transparency & trust, 68 against 54.
- Pingram, good for An agent that needs to send transactional email and SMS and read replies through one account without separate carrier or SMTP providers. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 69 against 60; Maintenance & community, 81 against 74.

| Category | Expo Push Notifications | Pingram |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 65 | 58 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 60 | 69 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 63 | 67 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 48 | 51 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 40 | 40 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 74 | 81 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 68 | 54 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Expo Push Notifications | Pingram |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Expo | Pingram |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://exp.host/--/api/v2/push/send` | `https://mcp.pingram.io` |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Expo's terms of service. The Node.js server SDK is MIT | Proprietary service under Pingram's terms of service. The Node.js SDK and CLI are MIT on npm. The Go SDK repository has no licence file |
| MCP registry | not listed | `io.pingram/mcp` |
| Last release | 2026-08-24 | 2026-10-08 |
| Terms last updated | 2025-05-29 | 2025-04-16 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-10-21 | 2025-04-16 |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 1k stars, 1.3M npm/wk | 1 stars, 13k npm/wk |