# EXAONE 4.5 33B vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT (slim)

> EXAONE 4.5 33B scores 61 (C) to OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT's 56.8 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/exaone-4-5-33b-vs-otel-2-0-llm-31b-it.md (~10,300 tokens) · this version ~830 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/exaone-4-5-33b-vs-otel-2-0-llm-31b-it.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/exaone-4-5-33b-vs-otel-2-0-llm-31b-it
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

EXAONE 4.5 33B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT's 56.8 (C), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT leads on risk and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- EXAONE 4.5 33B: C 61, rank #61 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/exaone-4-5-33b.min.md
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT: C 56.8, rank #111 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/otel-2-0-llm-31b-it.min.md
- EXAONE 4.5 33B, good for Researchers and students working on documents, Korean or multimodal agents who don't need commercial rights Ahead on Reach, 65 against 50; Agent interface, 85 against 60.
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT, good for Telecoms teams that want an open model for standards questions and RAG on their own hardware Ahead on Risk, 55 against 50; Documentation and upkeep, 74 against 50.

| Category | EXAONE 4.5 33B | OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 65 | 50 |
| Risk (20%) | 50 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 85 | 60 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 50 | 74 |

| Fact (where they differ) | EXAONE 4.5 33B | OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | LG AI Research | AT&T (Open Telco AI) |
| Licence | EXAONE AI Model License Agreement 1.2 - NC (research and education only) | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-07-06 | 2026-11-01 |
| Terms last updated | not read yet | no document linked |

Why the edge:
- Agent interface, EXAONE 4.5 33B +25: EXAONE 4.5 33B 85 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (5,930 characters).); OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT 60 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository, 19,300 characters, the publisher's own.)
- Documentation and upkeep, OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT +24: EXAONE 4.5 33B 50 (Model card 20, Uses (the quickstart's question answering, document and agent examples), limitations, the architecture, the parameters, the context, the language…); OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT 74 (Model card 14, Intended use, a long limitations section, the architecture and training method, the parameters (31B) and the language (English) are on the card.)
- Reach, EXAONE 4.5 33B +15: EXAONE 4.5 33B 65 (Memory 20, the smallest build at 4 bits is LG's IQ4_XS GGUF, 18.03 GB with the 2.57 GB projector, and 20.60 GB × 1.2 = 24.7 GB, within 32 GB.); OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT 50 (Memory 10, the publisher's only build is the BF16 safetensors, 62.55 GB for the 15 shards the index names, and 62.55 GB × 1.2 = 75.1 GB, above 64 GB and inside…)
- Risk, OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT +5: EXAONE 4.5 33B 50 (File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in the repository.); OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT 55 (File safety 25, safetensors only, with no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python files.)