# Envia vs TrackingMore (slim)

> TrackingMore scores 41.8 (E) to Envia's 36.5 (F) for shipment tracking. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/envia-vs-trackingmore.md (~3,600 tokens) · this version ~1,980 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/envia-vs-trackingmore.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/envia-vs-trackingmore
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-07
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

TrackingMore scores 41.8 (E) on agent readiness against Envia's 36.5 (F), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Envia leads on schema & documentation. Both do shipment tracking.

- Envia: F 36.5, rank #1362 of 1486 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/envia.min.md
- TrackingMore: E 41.8, rank #1276 of 1486 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/trackingmore.min.md
- Envia, good for Shops and platforms shipping in Mexico and Latin America that want rates and labels from many local carriers. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 80 against 31. Also Runs on your own machine.
- TrackingMore, good for An agent that reports where a parcel is across many carriers from a tracking number, with a cheap per-tracking price. Ahead on Reliability, 65 against 20; Maintenance & community, 19 against 10; Transparency & trust, 57 against 16. Also A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install.

| Category | Envia | TrackingMore |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 20 | 65 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 80 | 31 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 53 | 54 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 35 | 31 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 20 | 23 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 10 | 19 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 16 | 57 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Envia | TrackingMore |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Envia Shipping | CHANNELWILL CO., LIMITED |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | `https://api.trackingmore.com/v4` |
| Transports | stdio | HTTP |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium |
| Price for shipment tracking | not published | $0.03 per transaction |
| Licence | none | Proprietary hosted service under the CWILL Terms of Service. The seven official SDKs on GitHub are MIT |
| Tools exposed | 10 | none |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-03-06 | 2024-12-25 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2026-08-08 |
| Customer content may train models | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not read yet | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not read yet | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not read yet | yes |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Popularity | none | 6 stars |

Why the edge:
- Schema & documentation, Envia +49: Envia 80 (Each reference page's Markdown copy embeds an OpenAPI definition with sandbox and production servers (25). llms.txt and a Markdown copy of each page (10). Endpoint descriptions say what each is for and which call comes next in the workflow, and the rate tool warns that sandbox rates are simulated (15 of 20). The quote definition has 17 enums and required lists (11 of 15). Workflow examples and an error-formats guide named in the changelog, though its Markdown address answered 404 and the quote definition documents only 200 (9 of 15). A dated docs changelog by month, the latest March 2026 (10 of 15). 25 + 10 + 15 + 11 + 9 + 10 = 80.); TrackingMore 31 (No OpenAPI or similar file was found in the docs, the SDK repositories or a search, and the reference at trackingmore.com/docs renders by script so its schemas were not read (0 of 25). No llms.txt or Markdown docs (0). The official SDK READMEs give one line per call, and the support centre explains when to pair create with get or a webhook and that the create response carries the result (8 of 20). Field names and the required tracking_number and courier_code appear in the SDK examples, with no types, enums or constraints readable (5 of 15). Examples in seven SDK languages and a table of HTTP and meta codes with messages (12 of 15). v4 in the path with v2 and v3 still served, and the support centre says there is no changelog for switching versions. No dated API changelog was found (6 of 15). 0 + 0 + 8 + 5 + 12 + 6 = 31.)
- Reliability, TrackingMore +45: Envia 20 (Graded as a hosted service on Envia's REST APIs, with the local MCP server noted. No status page is linked and status.envia.com did not connect (0). No readable incident history (5). No rate limits found in the docs index, FAQs, integration guide or production checklist (0). The production checklist asks for 5xx retry logic and webhook deduplication, with no 429 or idempotency guidance for label creation (5 of 15). No SLA found (0). Neither the APIs nor the MCP server is labelled beta (10). 0 + 5 + 0 + 5 + 0 + 10 = 20.); TrackingMore 65 (Read with the hosted lines and scored on the REST API v4 at api.trackingmore.com. status.trackingmore.com is a hosted status page with uptime and a status update history (20). Its figures and history render by script, so the 90 days could not be read; the static text says there were no updates in the last 7 days (5). Rate limits are published per endpoint, 3 requests a second on trackings/create and 10 a second elsewhere, per account (15). The support centre says a 429 means the application should stop and wait 120 seconds, and a repeated create answers meta code 4101 rather than creating a duplicate. No Retry-After and no idempotency key (10 of 15). No SLA document was found. The Enterprise plan lists 99.99 per cent API uptime as a feature and the API page claims 99.9 per cent uptime, which is marketing rather than a published SLA (5 of 10). v4 is the current version and not marked beta (10). 20 + 5 + 15 + 10 + 5 + 10 = 65.)
- Transparency & trust, TrackingMore +41: Envia 16 (Every terms URL tried answered 500 and the privacy policy is drawn by script, so no terms, entity or data-handling statement was read (0 of 30, 0 of 30). No deprecation policy or dated notices (0). No subprocessors or data locations found (0). 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 0, as unread rather than absent where the pages exist.); TrackingMore 57 (Closed service. The terms are the CWILL group's (effective 9 January 2026), which say the contracting entity depends on the product, and the privacy policy names CHANNELWILL CO., LIMITED for TrackingMore. The SDKs are MIT (15 of 30). The privacy policy (8 August 2026) distinguishes controller and processor roles and links a DPA and a sub-processor list, neither read; no retention periods were read (12 of 30). v2 and v3 are still served with no notice policy or dates (4 of 20). A sub-processor list exists at trust.cwill.com and was not read; no data location is stated on the pages read (8 of 20). 15 + 12 + 4 + 8 = 39.)
- Maintenance & community, TrackingMore +9: Envia 10 (The latest dated change found is the docs changelog for March 2026 and @envia/envia-mcp 0.1.0 on 4 March 2026, more than 180 days ago; doc pages show later `updatedAt` stamps (28 October for the FAQ) that record no change (0). No dated entries in the 90 days from 8 August (0). Support through the dashboard and docs, with no public tracker; the MCP repository named on npm could not be cloned (5 of 15). The MCP package is official, with no API SDK and no registry entry (5 of 15). No public CI to read (0). 0 + 0 + 5 + 5 + 0 = 10.); TrackingMore 19 (Read as a closed service. No dated API change was found. The SDKs were last pushed between February and December 2024, the support articles are dated 2023 and 2024, and the reference is undated (0 of 30). No releases or dated entries in the last 90 days were found (0). Support by email and chat with a help centre; GitHub issues were not read (6 of 15). Seven official SDKs exist but none has changed since December 2024 (10 of 15). The Node SDK has tests and no CI workflow (3 of 10). 0 + 0 + 6 + 10 + 3 = 19.)