# Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) vs Trulioo (slim)

> Entrust Identity Verification scores 62.1 (B) to Trulioo's 58.2 (C) for identity verification. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/entrust-identity-verification-vs-trulioo.md (~3,000 tokens) · this version ~830 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/entrust-identity-verification-vs-trulioo.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/entrust-identity-verification-vs-trulioo
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-14

Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) scores 62.1 (B) on agent readiness against Trulioo's 58.2 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Trulioo leads on agent ergonomics, security & auth and maintenance & community. Both do identity verification.

- Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido): B 62.1, rank #472 of 1076 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/entrust-identity-verification.min.md
- Trulioo: C 58.2, rank #621 of 1076 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/trulioo.min.md
- Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido), good for A company already contracted with Entrust that wants an agent to create applicants, start workflow runs and read reports through typed libraries and a public spec. Ahead on Reliability, 70 against 19; Transparency & trust, 70 against 56.
- Trulioo, good for An agent doing business due diligence (search, verification, ownership, reports) or person checks across many countries for a company that already has a Trulioo contract, and for teams that want to test verification flows against synthetic data first. Ahead on Agent ergonomics, 78 against 65; Security & auth, 79 against 58; Maintenance & community, 75 against 58. Also A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install.

| Category | Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) | Trulioo |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 70 | 19 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 84 | 87 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 65 | 78 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 58 | 79 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 20 | 18 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 58 | 75 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 70 | 56 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) | Trulioo |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Onfido Ltd (Entrust) | Trulioo Information Services Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | `https://api.trulioo.com` |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Entrust's terms. The OpenAPI spec and the server libraries (onfido-java, onfido-node, onfido-php, onfido-python, onfido-ruby) are MIT | Proprietary service under a customer agreement that isn't public. The MCP plugin and the C# and Java REST SDKs on GitHub are Apache-2.0, and the capture SDKs fall under the Trulioo SDK Licence |
| Tools exposed | none | 18 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-08-31 | 2026-10-07 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated |  | 2025-10-01 |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read |  |
| Popularity | 59k npm/wk, 27k PyPI/wk | 0 stars, 131 npm/wk |