# Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) vs Socure RiskOS (slim)

> Socure RiskOS scores 63.5 (B) to Entrust Identity Verification's 62.1 (B) for identity verification. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/entrust-identity-verification-vs-socure-riskos.md (~3,050 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/entrust-identity-verification-vs-socure-riskos.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/entrust-identity-verification-vs-socure-riskos
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-14

Socure RiskOS scores 63.5 (B) on agent readiness against Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido)'s 62.1 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) leads on agent ergonomics. Both do identity verification.

- Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido): B 62.1, rank #472 of 1076 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/entrust-identity-verification.min.md
- Socure RiskOS: B 63.5, rank #417 of 1076 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/socure-riskos.min.md
- Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido), good for A company already contracted with Entrust that wants an agent to create applicants, start workflow runs and read reports through typed libraries and a public spec. Ahead on Agent ergonomics, 65 against 46.
- Socure RiskOS, good for A company in the United States that wants one decision from combined KYC, document, fraud and watchlist checks through a single evaluation call. Ahead on Reliability, 75 against 70; Payments & pricing, 35 against 20; Maintenance & community, 75 against 58. Also A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install.

| Category | Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) | Socure RiskOS |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 70 | 75 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 84 | 84 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 65 | 46 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 58 | 60 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 20 | 35 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 58 | 75 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 70 | 68 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) | Socure RiskOS |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Onfido Ltd (Entrust) | Socure Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | `https://mcp.riskos.socure.com/sandbox` |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Paid | Pay per use |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Entrust's terms. The OpenAPI spec and the server libraries (onfido-java, onfido-node, onfido-php, onfido-python, onfido-ruby) are MIT | Proprietary service. No service agreement is published, and the OpenAPI file states its licence as Proprietary |
| Tools exposed | none | 9 |
| Last release | 2026-08-31 | 2026-10-06 |
| Terms last updated | couldn't be read | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated |  | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | couldn't be read | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | couldn't be read |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | couldn't be read |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | couldn't be read |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | couldn't be read |  |
| Popularity | 59k npm/wk, 27k PyPI/wk | 35k npm/wk |