# Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Hunter API + MCP (slim)

> Hunter API + MCP has a score of 56.8 (C) against Enrich Layer API + MCP's 56 (C). Both do lead search. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 37 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/enrich-layer-vs-hunter.md (~1,550 tokens) · this version ~380 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/enrich-layer-vs-hunter.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/enrich-layer-vs-hunter
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

Hunter API + MCP has a score of 56.8 (C) against Enrich Layer API + MCP's 56 (C). Both do lead search. The largest gap is maintenance & community, 37 points.

- Enrich Layer API + MCP: C 56, rank #309 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/enrich-layer.min.md
- Hunter API + MCP: C 56.8, rank #299 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hunter.min.md
- Pick Enrich Layer API + MCP for reliability (+15), agent ergonomics (+14), security & auth (+7). Pick Hunter API + MCP for schema & documentation (+14), maintenance & community (+37), transparency & trust (+20).

| Category | Enrich Layer API + MCP | Hunter API + MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 65 | 50 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 76 | 90 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 68 | 54 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 40 | 33 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 40 | 40 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 26 | 63 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 61 | 81 |