{ "data": { "a": { "slug": "emdash", "name": "Emdash", "vendor": "General Action, Inc.", "vendorUrl": "https://emdash.sh", "kind": "harness", "category": "agent-harnesses", "summary": "Emdash is an open-source desktop app that runs coding agents such as Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode and Amp in parallel, each in its own Git worktree, locally or on remote machines over SSH, with issue intake and pull requests.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/emdash", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/emdash.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/emdash.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/emdash.json", "dns": "emdash.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/generalaction/emdash", "license": "Apache-2.0", "transports": [], "packages": [], "auth": "none", "pricing": "free", "pricingNotes": "Free and open source. You pay for the coding agents it runs, through your own subscriptions or API keys (checked 2026-11-07).", "priceSummary": "Free · OSS", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No payment protocol in the repository or README (checked 2026-11-07).", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": null, "npmWeekly": null, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-11-07" }, "docsUrl": "https://emdash.sh/docs", "capabilities": [ "agent.harness", "agent.multi-agent" ], "tags": [ "open-source", "apache-2.0", "desktop-app", "telemetry", "new" ], "lastRelease": "2026-11-06", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 53.9, "grade": "D", "agentReady": false, "rank": 933, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1510, "categoryRank": 35, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 55, "maintenance": 70, "payments": 60, "reliability": 55, "schema": 55, "security": 38, "transparency": 54 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "low", "date": "2026-11-07" }, "negative": 0, "verdict": "A mature open-source app for parallel coding agents in Git worktrees, with issue intake from a dozen trackers and remote machines over SSH. Telemetry is on unless you turn it off, and no test workflow was found in the repository.", "bestFor": "Developers who want parallel agents in worktrees, fed from their issue tracker, locally or over SSH.", "strengths": [ "Each task in its own Git worktree and branch", "Issues from Linear, GitHub, Jira, GitLab, Asana and more go straight to an agent", "Works on remote machines over SSH", "Apache 2.0, version 1.2, with macOS, Windows and Linux builds" ], "weaknesses": [ "Telemetry on unless turned off in Settings or with TELEMETRY_ENABLED=false", "No test workflow found, only consistency and release workflows", "No security policy file" ], "agentNotes": [ "Launch with TELEMETRY_ENABLED=false if you don't want telemetry", "Use the SSH mode to keep agents on a remote machine" ], "metrics": { "kind": "local", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "low", "grade": "D", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 53.9 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 55, "maintenance": 70, "payments": 60, "reliability": 55, "schema": 55, "security": 38, "transparency": 68 }, "provenanceScore": 40, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-07", "maintenance": "2026-11-07", "payments": "2026-11-07", "reliability": "2026-11-07", "schema": "2026-11-07", "security": "2026-11-07", "transparency": "2026-11-07" }, "last": "2026-11-07", "oldest": "2026-11-07", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "brew install --cask emdash" }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/agent.harness", "tool": "https://letme.dev/emdash" }, "area": "frameworks", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "General Action, Inc.", "domain": "emdash.sh", "domainRegistered": "", "domainNote": "Not looked up: RDAP isn't requested under the 1 November 2026 rules.", "endpointOnVendorDomain": null, "terms": "", "privacy": "", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-11-07", "notes": [ "The licence names General Action, Inc.. The repository is github.com/generalaction/emdash." ], "score": 40 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/emdash.json", "live": { "slug": "emdash", "securityTxt": { "url": "https://emdash.sh/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "none", "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T16:01:15.230445185Z" }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-07T16:01:15.230445185Z" } }, "answer": "Emdash scores 53.9 (D) on agent readiness against Paperclip's 52.6 (D), and leads in 0 of 7 scored categories. Paperclip leads on schema \u0026 documentation, agent ergonomics, security \u0026 auth, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust.", "b": { "slug": "paperclip", "name": "Paperclip", "vendor": "Paperclip Labs, Inc.", "vendorUrl": "https://paperclip.ing", "kind": "harness", "category": "agent-harnesses", "summary": "Paperclip is an open-source, self-hosted server and web interface that organises AI agents into a company with an org chart, tasks, budgets and approvals. It drives Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw and other harnesses through adapters.", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/paperclip", "markdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/paperclip.md", "slimMarkdownUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/paperclip.min.md", "jsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/paperclip.json", "dns": "paperclip.grade.anchorterminal.com", "repo": "https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip", "license": "MIT", "transports": [], "packages": [ { "registry": "npm", "name": "paperclipai" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@paperclipai/mcp-server" }, { "registry": "oci", "name": "ghcr.io/paperclipai/paperclip" } ], "auth": "mixed", "authNotes": "No Paperclip account. The default `local_trusted` mode needs no login on loopback. Authenticated mode uses browser sessions for people, board API keys for scripts, and agent API keys or short-lived run JWTs as bearer tokens.", "pricing": "free", "pricingNotes": "Free and MIT, self-hosted, with nothing to buy. The owner pays each harness's model provider or subscription. Paperclip Cloud is a waitlist with no published price.", "priceSummary": "Free · OSS", "where": "local", "x402": { "level": "no", "evidence": "No x402, MPP or L402 in the docs, the site or the server source (checked 2026-10-08). The only mention in the repository is a link to a third-party skill in a planning note.", "endpoints": [] }, "toolCount": null, "popularity": { "githubStars": 98666, "npmWeekly": 59684, "pypiWeekly": null, "asOf": "2026-10-08" }, "docsUrl": "https://docs.paperclip.ing", "llmsTxt": "https://paperclip.ing/llms.txt", "capabilities": [ "agent.multi-agent", "agent.mcp-client" ], "tags": [ "open-source", "self-hosted", "local", "free", "no-card", "llms-txt", "docker", "mcp", "typescript" ], "lastRelease": "2026-10-23", "graded": true, "anchor": { "graded": true, "score": 52.6, "grade": "D", "agentReady": false, "rank": 982, "ranked": true, "rankOf": 1510, "categoryRank": 39, "methodology": "0.7", "run": "2026-10-01", "scores": { "ergonomics": 70, "maintenance": 78, "payments": 60, "reliability": 59, "schema": 81, "security": 64, "transparency": 66 }, "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "assessment": { "confidence": "medium", "date": "2026-11-04" }, "negative": -15, "negativeNotes": [ "Advisories counted one by one, at this run's values (a fixed Critical or High over two months old 1, a fixed Moderate the vendor published 1, an unfixed High 2). OSV holds eleven Paperclip advisories, all published 10 to 16 April 2026. Four fixed Criticals, among them GHSA-68qg-g8mg-6pr7 (CVE-2026-41679, unauthenticated remote code execution through an import authorisation bypass, fixed 2026.410.0) and the cross-tenant key flaws GHSA-3xx2-mqjm-hg9x and GHSA-47wq-cj9q-wpmp, -4. Three fixed Highs (GHSA-265w-rf2w-cjh4, GHSA-w8hx-hqjv-vjcq, GHSA-xfqj-r5qw-8g4j), -3. Three fixed Moderates (GHSA-3pw3-v88x-xj24, GHSA-p7mm-r948-4q3q and GHSA-fpw4-p57j-hqmq, a stored XSS in the UI's Markdown links), -3. https://api.osv.dev/v1/query", "2026-04-16. GHSA-gqqj-85qm-8qhf (High), a `codex_local` agent inherited a Gmail connector from the owner's ChatGPT account and sent real email. OSV lists no fixed version, and `codex_local` still defaults to bypassing approvals and the sandbox, so it counts as unfixed, -2. https://api.osv.dev/v1/vulns/GHSA-gqqj-85qm-8qhf", "2026-07-22. GHSA-x8hx-rhr2-9rf7 (9.6), drive-by remote code execution against the default `local_trusted` mode through DNS rebinding. Per the 8 October check the advisory names no patched version and the source applies the hostname guard to `local_trusted` private deployments, read as fixed, over two months old, -1. It is not in OSV. https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/security/advisories/GHSA-x8hx-rhr2-9rf7", "2026-10-24. Commit 5db57347 (#17435) fixes plugin diagnostics routes that let a board member of one company read another company's plugin log messages, job run errors and webhook delivery errors. It is on master and in canary builds only, in no stable release (2026.1023.0 was promoted from a beta tagged on 11 October), with no advisory, -3. https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/pull/17435", "-4 -3 -3 -2 -1 -3 = -16, held at the -15 floor." ], "verdict": "Board approvals, budgets with a hard stop and an activity log sit above whichever harnesses do the work, with ten stable versions in 90 days. The Claude Code and Codex adapters skip permission prompts and the sandbox by default, twelve security advisories have appeared since April 2026, and a 24 October cross-company read fix is in no stable release.", "bestFor": "Someone running several coding or operations agents who wants one place for tasks, budgets, approvals and history across harnesses.", "strengths": [ "One deployment runs agents on Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, Pi, Hermes, Grok Build, Kimi Code and OpenClaw through adapters, under one org chart", "Board approvals gate agent hires and the CEO agent's strategy, and connection actions can be set to Allowed, Ask first or Off", "Budgets by company, agent and project pause an agent at 100 per cent of recorded spend", "The running server publishes its REST surface as OpenAPI at `/api/openapi.json`, and the docs site answers every page as Markdown at `.md`", "Ten stable releases between 17 August and 23 October 2026, each with dated notes, a Breaking Changes section and an upgrade guide" ], "weaknesses": [ "`claude_local` defaults `dangerouslySkipPermissions` to true and `codex_local` defaults to bypassing approvals and the sandbox, with agents running on the host", "Twelve published security advisories since April 2026, five critical, including CVE-2026-41679 (unauthenticated remote code execution, fixed in 2026.410.0)", "Anonymous usage telemetry is on by default and goes to telemetry.paperclip.ing until an opt-out is set", "2,849 open issues on 8 October 2026, 1,396 of them with no comment, and 78 closed in 30 days against 686 opened", "Calendar versions with no 1.0, and release 2026.916.0 carried five breaking changes" ], "agentNotes": [ "Set `PAPERCLIP_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1` or `DO_NOT_TRACK=1` before the first start. Telemetry is on by default", "Set `dangerouslySkipPermissions` and `dangerouslyBypassApprovalsAndSandbox` to false on agents that read untrusted input, or run them in a sandbox provider", "Install with Node.js 24.11 or newer, and install and sign in to each harness CLI on the host first. Paperclip assumes they are there", "Use `--bind lan` or `--bind tailnet` at onboarding for anything beyond one machine. The default `local_trusted` mode treats every request as the board admin", "Treat 409 on task checkout as owned by another agent and pick different work. The API docs say not to retry" ], "metrics": { "kind": "local", "measured": false }, "reviewCount": 0, "avgRating": 0, "history": [ { "basis": "public evidence", "confidence": "medium", "grade": "D", "methodology": "0.7", "pending": [ "performance", "tasks" ], "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "score": 52.6 } ], "editorialScores": { "ergonomics": 70, "maintenance": 78, "payments": 60, "reliability": 59, "schema": 81, "security": 64, "transparency": 73 }, "provenanceScore": 58, "checked": { "categories": { "ergonomics": "2026-11-04", "maintenance": "2026-11-04", "payments": "2026-11-04", "reliability": "2026-11-04", "schema": "2026-11-04", "security": "2026-11-04", "transparency": "2026-11-04" }, "last": "2026-11-04", "lastMoved": "2026-11-04", "oldest": "2026-11-04", "stale": false, "staleAfterDays": 90 } }, "connect": { "install": "npx paperclipai@latest onboard --yes # Node.js 24.11 or newer", "http": "curl http://localhost:3100/api/health", "headless": { "command": "npx paperclipai issue create --title \"$TASK\" --json", "env": { "PAPERCLIP_API_KEY": "\u003cboard or agent key\u003e", "PAPERCLIP_TELEMETRY_DISABLED": "1" } } }, "letme": { "capability": "https://letme.dev/agent.multi-agent", "tool": "https://letme.dev/paperclip" }, "area": "frameworks", "provenance": { "legalEntity": "Paperclip Labs, Inc.", "domain": "paperclip.ing", "domainRegistered": "2026-03-02", "endpointOnVendorDomain": null, "terms": "https://paperclip.ing/terms/", "privacy": "https://paperclip.ing/privacy/", "statusPage": "", "changelog": "https://paperclip.ing/changelog/", "securityTxt": "none", "checked": "2026-10-08", "notes": [ "The terms (effective 1 April 2026, updated 23 July 2026) and the privacy policy (effective 23 July 2026) name Paperclip Labs, Inc. and Delaware law. The licence file in the repository reads Copyright (c) 2025 Paperclip AI.", "RDAP at the .ing registry gives a registration date of 2026-03-02 for paperclip.ing, with Cloudflare as registrar. The GitHub repository was created the same day.", "paperclip.ing/.well-known/security.txt and docs.paperclip.ing/.well-known/security.txt returned 404 on 8 October 2026. SECURITY.md sends reports to GitHub private advisories.", "The software is self-hosted, so there is no vendor endpoint or status page to check. status.paperclip.ing did not answer.", "The privacy policy says it governs the hosted services, and that a self-hosted deployment processes data on the owner's infrastructure." ], "score": 58 }, "pageJsonUrl": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/paperclip.json", "live": { "slug": "paperclip", "versions": [ { "registry": "github", "name": "paperclipai/paperclip", "version": "v2026.1106.0", "released": "2026-11-06", "seenAt": "2026-11-06T23:54:27.395759821Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "@paperclipai/mcp-server", "version": "2026.1106.0", "seenAt": "2026-11-06T23:54:25.875367104Z" }, { "registry": "npm", "name": "paperclipai", "version": "2026.1106.0", "seenAt": "2026-11-06T23:54:25.202880061Z" } ], "githubStars": 111739, "npmWeekly": 55631, "securityTxt": { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/.well-known/security.txt", "state": "none", "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T16:01:01.774301174Z" }, "llmsTxt": { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/llms.txt", "ok": true, "status": 200, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T15:33:34.992030626Z" }, "domain": { "domain": "paperclip.ing", "registered": "2026-03-02", "source": "https://pubapi.registry.google/rdap/domain/paperclip.ing", "checkedAt": "2026-11-01T14:22:49.390462839Z" }, "pages": [ { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/changelog/", "kind": "changelog", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:15:55.15829297Z", "changedAt": "2026-10-24T02:22:26.710785766Z", "fingerprint": "a227bbb641b7" }, { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/changelog/v2026.1001.0/", "kind": "deprecations", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:15:57.262424846Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "f4181b1b6b88" }, { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/changelog/v2026.1005.0/", "kind": "deprecations", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:15:59.373178947Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "802a09c9725b" }, { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/changelog/v2026.1012.0/", "kind": "deprecations", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:16:01.420841708Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "0afbb1fc6f29" }, { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/changelog/v2026.1023.0/", "kind": "deprecations", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:16:03.413299546Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "9a8de031b163" }, { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/changelog/v2026.916.0/", "kind": "deprecations", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:16:05.190283004Z", "changedAt": "0001-01-01T00:00:00Z", "fingerprint": "1e69b918c7c5" }, { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/privacy/", "kind": "privacy", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:16:07.376360782Z", "changedAt": "2026-10-24T02:22:28.926605099Z", "fingerprint": "0f001aba3049" }, { "url": "https://paperclip.ing/terms/", "kind": "terms", "status": 304, "checkedAt": "2026-11-07T14:16:09.360818389Z", "changedAt": "2026-10-24T02:22:30.943098177Z", "fingerprint": "42aee815daee" } ], "github": { "repo": "paperclipai/paperclip", "checkedAt": "2026-11-02T09:14:52.889851537Z", "stars": 110038, "archived": false, "issuesEnabled": true, "pushedAt": "2026-11-02T06:27:13Z", "openIssues": 3464, "openPRs": 3161, "issuesOpened90d": 1860, "issuesClosed90d": 461, "prsMerged90d": 2751, "ci": { "branch": "master", "runs": 50, "success": 43, "failure": 4, "other": 3, "latest": "success", "latestAt": "2026-11-02T06:27:47Z" }, "advisories": [ { "ghsa": "GHSA-x8hx-rhr2-9rf7", "severity": "critical", "published": "2026-07-22T23:12:15Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-3xx2-mqjm-hg9x", "severity": "critical", "published": "2026-04-16T12:24:49Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-fpw4-p57j-hqmq", "severity": "medium", "published": "2026-04-16T12:24:23Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-p7mm-r948-4q3q", "severity": "medium", "published": "2026-04-16T12:24:03Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-47wq-cj9q-wpmp", "severity": "critical", "published": "2026-04-16T12:23:29Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-vr7g-88fq-vhq3", "severity": "critical", "published": "2026-04-16T12:21:04Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-gqqj-85qm-8qhf", "severity": "high", "published": "2026-04-16T12:19:12Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-xfqj-r5qw-8g4j", "severity": "high", "published": "2026-04-16T12:16:47Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-w8hx-hqjv-vjcq", "severity": "high", "published": "2026-04-16T12:16:15Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-265w-rf2w-cjh4", "cve": "CVE-2026-41208", "severity": "high", "published": "2026-04-16T12:15:14Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-3pw3-v88x-xj24", "severity": "medium", "published": "2026-04-16T12:14:14Z" }, { "ghsa": "GHSA-68qg-g8mg-6pr7", "cve": "CVE-2026-41679", "severity": "critical", "published": "2026-04-10T16:50:27Z" } ] }, "updatedAt": "2026-11-07T16:01:01.774301174Z" } }, "edges": [ { "by": 26, "category": "schema", "leads": "paperclip", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "reasons": { "a": "Harness reading. Docs site and a workspace server package (55).", "b": "The running server publishes OpenAPI at `/api/openapi.json` and validates requests with Zod, and the MCP server's tools take Zod schemas. No copy of the spec is published on the docs site, and paperclip.ing/openapi.json describes only the website (22). llms.txt at paperclip.ing, and docs pages answer as Markdown at `.md` (10). An API reference page per resource and task guides, but the MCP tool descriptions are one line each, such as List agents in a company (13). Typed inputs throughout, apart from the `paperclipApiRequest` tool, which takes any path under `/api` and a JSON body (12). cURL, JavaScript and Python examples and a status-code table, with one `{error}` shape and an occasional `details` field (12). A changelog page for every stable release and release notes in the repository, but the API path carries no version (12)." }, "scores": { "a": 55, "b": 81 } }, { "by": 26, "category": "security", "leads": "paperclip", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "reasons": { "a": "Harness reading. Telemetry is described as optional and disabled in Settings or with TELEMETRY_ENABLED=false, which reads as on by default (15 of 30). Worktree per task and remote machines over SSH (10 of 20). No prompt-injection guidance (5). No audit log (5). No security policy file found (3). 15 + 10 + 5 + 5 + 3 = 38.", "b": "Harness reading of the framework checklist, as used for the other harnesses. 30 for what leaves the machine by default, 20 for approvals and sandboxing, 15 for prompt-injection posture, 15 for audit and 20 for the security programme. Anonymous usage telemetry is on by default and goes to telemetry.paperclip.ing. The README lists what is excluded and four opt-outs, and Sentry and OpenTelemetry stay off until configured. We found no first-run notice in the CLI source (18). Board approvals for hires and strategy, execution policies and per-action connection permissions, but `claude_local` defaults `dangerouslySkipPermissions` to true, `codex_local` defaults to bypassing approvals and the sandbox, local agents run on the host, sandbox providers are optional plugins and the default `local_trusted` mode has no login (10). A documented `low_trust_review` preset contains agents that read untrusted pull requests or tickets. It is opt-in (10). An activity log of mutating actions, run logs, cost events and audited board API keys (14). SECURITY.md with GitHub private reporting and twelve advisories published per the 8 October check, three now with CVEs in OSV. No security.txt, bug bounty or SOC 2 report found (12)." }, "scores": { "a": 38, "b": 64 } }, { "by": 15, "category": "ergonomics", "leads": "paperclip", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "reasons": { "a": "Harness reading. Issue intake from Linear, GitHub, Jira and others, diff review, pull requests and CI checks in one place, local or over SSH (55).", "b": "Harness reading of the framework line, scored on what an agent or pipeline driving it has to supply. The MCP server lists 44 tools with no toolsets or read-only subset found, offset by compact reads such as `paperclipInboxLite` and the heartbeat context (12). Budgets by company, agent and project with an automatic pause at 100 per cent, though the README says enforcement uses recorded spend and can lag work in flight (16). `onboard --yes`, CLI commands with `--json`, the REST API and routines started by cron, webhook or API (16). Atomic task checkout with a documented 409, `Idempotency-Key` on routine triggers, saved sessions and bounded recovery (17). One command starts a server with embedded PostgreSQL, but it needs Node.js 24.11 and each harness CLI installed and signed in on the host, and we found no client SDK beyond the TypeScript plugin SDK (9)." }, "scores": { "a": 55, "b": 70 } }, { "by": 12, "category": "transparency", "leads": "paperclip", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "reasons": { "a": "Apache 2.0 (30). A telemetry page on the docs site (not read) (18 of 30). No deprecation policy (5). Disclosed with an opt-out (15 of 20). 30 + 18 + 5 + 15 = 68.", "b": "MIT (30). The privacy policy of 23 July 2026 separates self-hosted use from the hosted services and names Paperclip Labs, Inc., but keeps data as long as reasonably necessary, lists no subprocessors, and the 90-day telemetry retention appears only in source. The terms grant a broad licence over content sent to the services and allow model training on opt-in detailed telemetry (16). Release notes carry dated Breaking Changes sections and upgrade guides, with no written deprecation policy or notice period (10). The README discloses telemetry, what it excludes and four opt-outs, and the event contract is public in the repository, but it is on by default (17)." }, "scores": { "a": 54, "b": 66 } }, { "by": 8, "category": "maintenance", "leads": "paperclip", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "reasons": { "a": "v1.2.11 on 6 November 2026 (30). v1.2.9, v1.2.10 and v1.2.11 within two weeks (20). GitHub issues and pull requests weren't read (GitHub's pages refuse these sessions), so that line is scored absent (0). Current installers and Homebrew cask (15). Release workflows, no test CI (5). 30 + 20 + 0 + 15 + 5 = 70.", "b": "Version 2026.1023.0, released on 23 October 2026 per its notes and the site banner (30). Ten stable releases from 2026.817.0 (17 August) to 2026.1023.0 in the 90 days to 4 November (20). Per the 8 October check, not re-read on 4 November, 650 pull requests merged in the last 30 days, but 2,849 issues and 3,338 pull requests were open, 1,396 open issues had no comment, and 309 of the 472 still-open issues from the two weeks before had none (8). `paperclipai` and `@paperclipai/mcp-server` publish from the same release workflow. We did not check the MCP registry (12). CI on master, a lockfile refresh workflow and signed image attestations (8). 30 + 20 + 8 + 12 + 8 = 78." }, "scores": { "a": 70, "b": 78 } } ], "facts": [ { "a": "Agent harness", "b": "Agent harness", "name": "Kind" }, { "a": "General Action, Inc.", "b": "Paperclip Labs, Inc.", "name": "Vendor" }, { "a": "no (local only)", "b": "no (local only)", "name": "Hosted endpoint" }, { "a": "", "b": "", "name": "Transports" }, { "a": "None", "b": "OAuth or key", "name": "Auth" }, { "a": "Free", "b": "Free", "name": "Pricing" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "x402" }, { "a": "Apache-2.0", "b": "MIT", "name": "Licence" }, { "a": "no", "b": "no", "name": "Read-only variant documented" }, { "a": "no", "b": "yes", "name": "llms.txt" }, { "a": "2026-11-06", "b": "2026-10-23", "name": "Last release" }, { "a": "no document linked", "b": "2026-07-23", "name": "Terms last updated" }, { "a": "no document linked", "b": "2026-07-23", "name": "Privacy policy last updated" }, { "a": "not read yet", "b": "yes, with an opt-out", "name": "Customer content may train models" }, { "a": "not read yet", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms restrict automated access" }, { "a": "not read yet", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms restrict benchmarking" }, { "a": "not read yet", "b": "not found in the text", "name": "Terms or service can change without notice" }, { "a": "not read yet", "b": "yes", "name": "Arbitration or class-action waiver" }, { "a": "none", "b": "99k stars, 60k npm/wk", "name": "Popularity" } ], "faq": [ { "answer": "Emdash scores 53.9 (D) on agent readiness against Paperclip's 52.6 (D), and leads in 0 of 7 scored categories. Paperclip leads on schema \u0026 documentation, agent ergonomics, security \u0026 auth, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust.", "question": "Which is better for AI agents, Emdash or Paperclip?" }, { "answer": "Yes. Emdash is open source (Apache-2.0). Paperclip is open source (MIT).", "question": "Are Emdash and Paperclip open source?" } ], "goodFor": [ { "aheadOn": null, "also": [ "No key needed to call it", "No incidents deducted, where Paperclip loses 15 points for them" ], "goodFor": "Developers who want parallel agents in worktrees, fed from their issue tracker, locally or over SSH.", "slug": "emdash", "watchFor": "Telemetry on unless turned off in Settings or with TELEMETRY_ENABLED=false" }, { "aheadOn": [ "Schema \u0026 documentation, 81 against 55", "Agent ergonomics, 70 against 55", "Security \u0026 auth, 64 against 38", "Maintenance \u0026 community, 78 against 70", "Transparency \u0026 trust, 66 against 54" ], "also": [ "Free to start without a card" ], "goodFor": "Someone running several coding or operations agents who wants one place for tasks, budgets, approvals and history across harnesses.", "slug": "paperclip", "watchFor": "`claude_local` defaults `dangerouslySkipPermissions` to true and `codex_local` defaults to bypassing approvals and the sandbox, with agents running on the host" } ], "history": { "emdash": null, "paperclip": [ { "causes": [ "correction" ], "date": "2026-11-04", "delta": -6.4, "from": 59, "fromGrade": "C", "to": 52.6, "toGrade": "D" }, { "causes": [ "method" ], "date": "2026-10-27", "delta": 0, "from": 59, "fromGrade": "C", "to": 59, "toGrade": "C" } ] }, "job": { "capability": "agent.multi-agent", "name": "Multi-agent orchestration" }, "others": [ { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agent-zero-vs-emdash.json", "title": "Agent Zero vs Emdash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agent-zero-vs-emdash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/aider-vs-emdash.json", "title": "Aider vs Emdash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/aider-vs-emdash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-emdash.json", "title": "Amp vs Emdash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-emdash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antigravity-cli-vs-emdash.json", "title": "Antigravity CLI vs Emdash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antigravity-cli-vs-emdash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/auggie-vs-emdash.json", "title": "Auggie CLI vs Emdash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/auggie-vs-emdash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axlr-vs-emdash.json", "title": "AXLR vs Emdash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axlr-vs-emdash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-code-vs-emdash.json", "title": "Claude Code vs Emdash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-code-vs-emdash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cline-vs-emdash.json", "title": "Cline vs Emdash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cline-vs-emdash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/conductor-vs-emdash.json", "title": "Conductor vs Emdash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/conductor-vs-emdash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crush-vs-emdash.json", "title": "Crush vs Emdash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crush-vs-emdash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cursor-cli-vs-emdash.json", "title": "Cursor CLI vs Emdash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cursor-cli-vs-emdash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-emdash.json", "title": "DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Emdash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-emdash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-superagent-vs-emdash.json", "title": "dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Emdash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-superagent-vs-emdash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devin-vs-emdash.json", "title": "Devin vs Emdash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devin-vs-emdash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/droid-cli-vs-emdash.json", "title": "Droid CLI vs Emdash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/droid-cli-vs-emdash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/earendil-pi-vs-emdash.json", "title": "Pi vs Emdash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/earendil-pi-vs-emdash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-gemini-cli.json", "title": "Emdash vs Gemini CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-gemini-cli" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-github-copilot-cli.json", "title": "Emdash vs GitHub Copilot CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-github-copilot-cli" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-goose.json", "title": "Emdash vs goose", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-goose" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-harness2.json", "title": "Emdash vs Harness²", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-harness2" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-harnessrouter.json", "title": "Emdash vs HarnessRouter", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-harnessrouter" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-jules.json", "title": "Emdash vs Jules", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-jules" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-junie.json", "title": "Emdash vs Junie CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-junie" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-kilo-code-cli.json", "title": "Emdash vs Kilo Code CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-kilo-code-cli" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-kimi-code-cli.json", "title": "Emdash vs Kimi Code CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-kimi-code-cli" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-kiro-cli.json", "title": "Emdash vs Kiro CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-kiro-cli" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-letta.json", "title": "Emdash vs Letta", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-letta" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-mini-swe-agent.json", "title": "Emdash vs mini-swe-agent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-mini-swe-agent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-minimax-code.json", "title": "Emdash vs MiniMax Code", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-minimax-code" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-mistral-vibe-cli.json", "title": "Emdash vs Mistral Vibe CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-mistral-vibe-cli" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-muse-code.json", "title": "Emdash vs Muse Code", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-muse-code" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-openai-agents-api.json", "title": "Emdash vs OpenAI Agents API", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-openai-agents-api" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-openai-codex.json", "title": "Emdash vs OpenAI Codex", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-openai-codex" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-opencode.json", "title": "Emdash vs OpenCode", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-opencode" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-openhands.json", "title": "Emdash vs OpenHands", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-openhands" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-openmausbot.json", "title": "Emdash vs OpenMausBot", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-openmausbot" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-orca.json", "title": "Emdash vs Orca", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-orca" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-paseo.json", "title": "Emdash vs Paseo", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-paseo" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-prime-agent.json", "title": "Emdash vs Prime Agent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-prime-agent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-qoder-cli.json", "title": "Emdash vs Qoder CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-qoder-cli" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-qwen-code.json", "title": "Emdash vs Qwen Code", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-qwen-code" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-reflection-mirror.json", "title": "Emdash vs Mirror CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-reflection-mirror" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-rovo-dev-cli.json", "title": "Emdash vs Rovo Dev CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-rovo-dev-cli" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-sculptor.json", "title": "Emdash vs Sculptor", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-sculptor" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-t3-code.json", "title": "Emdash vs T3 Code", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-t3-code" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-traycer.json", "title": "Emdash vs Traycer", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-traycer" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-unstoppable.json", "title": "Emdash vs Unstoppable", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-unstoppable" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Emdash vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-vibe-trading.json", "title": "Emdash vs Vibe-Trading", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-vibe-trading" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-warp.json", "title": "Emdash vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-warp" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Amp vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antigravity-cli-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Antigravity CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antigravity-cli-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/auggie-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Auggie CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/auggie-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axlr-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "AXLR vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axlr-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-code-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Claude Code vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-code-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-emdash.json", "title": "Clawboo vs Emdash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-emdash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Clawboo vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-emdash.json", "title": "CLI Manager vs Emdash", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-emdash" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "CLI Manager vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cline-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Cline vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cline-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/conductor-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Conductor vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/conductor-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crush-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Crush vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crush-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-superagent-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-superagent-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devin-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Devin vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devin-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/droid-cli-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Droid CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/droid-cli-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-harness-autonomous.json", "title": "Emdash vs Harness", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-harness-autonomous" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-parallax-agents.json", "title": "Emdash vs Parallax", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-parallax-agents" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-cli-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Gemini CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-cli-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/github-copilot-cli-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "GitHub Copilot CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/github-copilot-cli-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/goose-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "goose vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/goose-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-autonomous-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Harness vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-autonomous-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harnessrouter-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "HarnessRouter vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harnessrouter-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jules-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Jules vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jules-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/junie-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Junie CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/junie-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kilo-code-cli-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Kilo Code CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kilo-code-cli-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kimi-code-cli-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Kimi Code CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kimi-code-cli-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kiro-cli-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Kiro CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kiro-cli-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/letta-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Letta vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/letta-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minimax-code-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "MiniMax Code vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minimax-code-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mistral-vibe-cli-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Mistral Vibe CLI vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mistral-vibe-cli-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-code-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Muse Code vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-code-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/opencode-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "OpenCode vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/opencode-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openhands-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "OpenHands vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openhands-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openmausbot-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "OpenMausBot vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openmausbot-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/orca-vs-paperclip.json", "title": "Orca vs Paperclip", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/orca-vs-paperclip" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-parallax-agents.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Parallax", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-parallax-agents" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-paseo.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Paseo", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-paseo" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-prime-agent.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Prime Agent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-prime-agent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-qoder-cli.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Qoder CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-qoder-cli" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-qwen-code.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Qwen Code", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-qwen-code" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-reflection-mirror.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Mirror CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-reflection-mirror" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-rovo-dev-cli.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Rovo Dev CLI", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-rovo-dev-cli" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-sculptor.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Sculptor", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-sculptor" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-t3-code.json", "title": "Paperclip vs T3 Code", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-t3-code" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-traycer.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Traycer", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-traycer" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-unstoppable.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Unstoppable", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-unstoppable" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-verdent.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Verdent", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-verdent" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-vibe-trading.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Vibe-Trading", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-vibe-trading" }, { "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-warp.json", "title": "Paperclip vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-warp" } ], "panel": null, "scores": [ { "by": 4, "edge": "paperclip", "emdash": 55, "key": "reliability", "name": "Reliability", "paperclip": 59, "weight": 16 }, { "key": "performance", "name": "Performance", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 26, "edge": "paperclip", "emdash": 55, "key": "schema", "name": "Schema \u0026 documentation", "paperclip": 81, "weight": 13 }, { "by": 15, "edge": "paperclip", "emdash": 55, "key": "ergonomics", "name": "Agent ergonomics", "paperclip": 70, "weight": 13 }, { "by": 26, "edge": "paperclip", "emdash": 38, "key": "security", "name": "Security \u0026 auth", "paperclip": 64, "weight": 14 }, { "by": 0, "edge": "", "emdash": 60, "key": "payments", "name": "Payments \u0026 pricing", "paperclip": 60, "weight": 10 }, { "key": "tasks", "name": "Task success", "pending": true, "weight": 10 }, { "by": 8, "edge": "paperclip", "emdash": 70, "key": "maintenance", "name": "Maintenance \u0026 community", "paperclip": 78, "weight": 7 }, { "by": 12, "edge": "paperclip", "emdash": 54, "key": "transparency", "name": "Transparency \u0026 trust", "paperclip": 66, "weight": 7 } ], "summary": "Emdash scores 53.9 (D) on agent readiness against Paperclip's 52.6 (D), and leads in 0 of 7 scored categories. Paperclip leads on schema \u0026 documentation, agent ergonomics, security \u0026 auth, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do multi-agent orchestration.", "tasks": null, "tutorials": [], "verdicts": { "emdash": "A mature open-source app for parallel coding agents in Git worktrees, with issue intake from a dozen trackers and remote machines over SSH. Telemetry is on unless you turn it off, and no test workflow was found in the repository.", "paperclip": "Board approvals, budgets with a hard stop and an activity log sit above whichever harnesses do the work, with ten stable versions in 90 days. The Claude Code and Codex adapters skip permission prompts and the sandbox by default, twelve security advisories have appeared since April 2026, and a 24 October cross-company read fix is in no stable release." } }, "kind": "anchor.page", "links": { "api": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json", "html": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-paperclip", "json": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-paperclip.json", "llms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt", "markdown": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-paperclip.md", "mcp": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp", "slim": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-paperclip.min.md" }, "markdown": "Emdash scores 53.9 (D) on agent readiness against Paperclip's 52.6 (D), and leads in 0 of 7 scored categories. Paperclip leads on schema \u0026 documentation, agent ergonomics, security \u0026 auth, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust. Both do multi-agent orchestration.\n\n- Emdash: grade D, 53.9/100, rank #933 of 1510. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/emdash.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/emdash.json\n- Paperclip: grade D, 52.6/100, rank #982 of 1510. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/paperclip.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/paperclip.json\n- Best agent harnesses and coding agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/agent-harnesses/index.md\n- All 1500 harnesses comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agent-harnesses/index.md\n\n## Which one, for what\n\n### Emdash (D)\n\nGood for: Developers who want parallel agents in worktrees, fed from their issue tracker, locally or over SSH.\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- No key needed to call it\n- No incidents deducted, where Paperclip loses 15 points for them\n\nWatch for: Telemetry on unless turned off in Settings or with TELEMETRY_ENABLED=false\n\n### Paperclip (D)\n\nGood for: Someone running several coding or operations agents who wants one place for tasks, budgets, approvals and history across harnesses.\n\nAhead on:\n- Schema \u0026 documentation, 81 against 55\n- Agent ergonomics, 70 against 55\n- Security \u0026 auth, 64 against 38\n- Maintenance \u0026 community, 78 against 70\n- Transparency \u0026 trust, 66 against 54\n\nAlso in its favour:\n- Free to start without a card\n\nWatch for: `claude_local` defaults `dangerouslySkipPermissions` to true and `codex_local` defaults to bypassing approvals and the sandbox, with agents running on the host\n\n\n## Why the edge\n\n### Schema \u0026 documentation: Paperclip +26\n\n- Emdash (55): Harness reading. Docs site and a workspace server package (55).\n- Paperclip (81): The running server publishes OpenAPI at `/api/openapi.json` and validates requests with Zod, and the MCP server's tools take Zod schemas. No copy of the spec is published on the docs site, and paperclip.ing/openapi.json describes only the website (22). llms.txt at paperclip.ing, and docs pages answer as Markdown at `.md` (10). An API reference page per resource and task guides, but the MCP tool descriptions are one line each, such as List agents in a company (13). Typed inputs throughout, apart from the `paperclipApiRequest` tool, which takes any path under `/api` and a JSON body (12). cURL, JavaScript and Python examples and a status-code table, with one `{error}` shape and an occasional `details` field (12). A changelog page for every stable release and release notes in the repository, but the API path carries no version (12).\n\n### Security \u0026 auth: Paperclip +26\n\n- Emdash (38): Harness reading. Telemetry is described as optional and disabled in Settings or with TELEMETRY_ENABLED=false, which reads as on by default (15 of 30). Worktree per task and remote machines over SSH (10 of 20). No prompt-injection guidance (5). No audit log (5). No security policy file found (3). 15 + 10 + 5 + 5 + 3 = 38.\n- Paperclip (64): Harness reading of the framework checklist, as used for the other harnesses. 30 for what leaves the machine by default, 20 for approvals and sandboxing, 15 for prompt-injection posture, 15 for audit and 20 for the security programme. Anonymous usage telemetry is on by default and goes to telemetry.paperclip.ing. The README lists what is excluded and four opt-outs, and Sentry and OpenTelemetry stay off until configured. We found no first-run notice in the CLI source (18). Board approvals for hires and strategy, execution policies and per-action connection permissions, but `claude_local` defaults `dangerouslySkipPermissions` to true, `codex_local` defaults to bypassing approvals and the sandbox, local agents run on the host, sandbox providers are optional plugins and the default `local_trusted` mode has no login (10). A documented `low_trust_review` preset contains agents that read untrusted pull requests or tickets. It is opt-in (10). An activity log of mutating actions, run logs, cost events and audited board API keys (14). SECURITY.md with GitHub private reporting and twelve advisories published per the 8 October check, three now with CVEs in OSV. No security.txt, bug bounty or SOC 2 report found (12).\n\n### Agent ergonomics: Paperclip +15\n\n- Emdash (55): Harness reading. Issue intake from Linear, GitHub, Jira and others, diff review, pull requests and CI checks in one place, local or over SSH (55).\n- Paperclip (70): Harness reading of the framework line, scored on what an agent or pipeline driving it has to supply. The MCP server lists 44 tools with no toolsets or read-only subset found, offset by compact reads such as `paperclipInboxLite` and the heartbeat context (12). Budgets by company, agent and project with an automatic pause at 100 per cent, though the README says enforcement uses recorded spend and can lag work in flight (16). `onboard --yes`, CLI commands with `--json`, the REST API and routines started by cron, webhook or API (16). Atomic task checkout with a documented 409, `Idempotency-Key` on routine triggers, saved sessions and bounded recovery (17). One command starts a server with embedded PostgreSQL, but it needs Node.js 24.11 and each harness CLI installed and signed in on the host, and we found no client SDK beyond the TypeScript plugin SDK (9).\n\n### Transparency \u0026 trust: Paperclip +12\n\n- Emdash (54): Apache 2.0 (30). A telemetry page on the docs site (not read) (18 of 30). No deprecation policy (5). Disclosed with an opt-out (15 of 20). 30 + 18 + 5 + 15 = 68.\n- Paperclip (66): MIT (30). The privacy policy of 23 July 2026 separates self-hosted use from the hosted services and names Paperclip Labs, Inc., but keeps data as long as reasonably necessary, lists no subprocessors, and the 90-day telemetry retention appears only in source. The terms grant a broad licence over content sent to the services and allow model training on opt-in detailed telemetry (16). Release notes carry dated Breaking Changes sections and upgrade guides, with no written deprecation policy or notice period (10). The README discloses telemetry, what it excludes and four opt-outs, and the event contract is public in the repository, but it is on by default (17).\n\n### Maintenance \u0026 community: Paperclip +8\n\n- Emdash (70): v1.2.11 on 6 November 2026 (30). v1.2.9, v1.2.10 and v1.2.11 within two weeks (20). GitHub issues and pull requests weren't read (GitHub's pages refuse these sessions), so that line is scored absent (0). Current installers and Homebrew cask (15). Release workflows, no test CI (5). 30 + 20 + 0 + 15 + 5 = 70.\n- Paperclip (78): Version 2026.1023.0, released on 23 October 2026 per its notes and the site banner (30). Ten stable releases from 2026.817.0 (17 August) to 2026.1023.0 in the 90 days to 4 November (20). Per the 8 October check, not re-read on 4 November, 650 pull requests merged in the last 30 days, but 2,849 issues and 3,338 pull requests were open, 1,396 open issues had no comment, and 309 of the 472 still-open issues from the two weeks before had none (8). `paperclipai` and `@paperclipai/mcp-server` publish from the same release workflow. We did not check the MCP registry (12). CI on master, a lockfile refresh workflow and signed image attestations (8). 30 + 20 + 8 + 12 + 8 = 78.\n\n## Score by category\n\n| Category | Weight | Emdash | Paperclip | Edge |\n| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |\n| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 55 | 59 | Paperclip +4 |\n| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Schema \u0026 documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 55 | 81 | Paperclip +26 |\n| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 55 | 70 | Paperclip +15 |\n| Security \u0026 auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 38 | 64 | Paperclip +26 |\n| Payments \u0026 pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 60 | 60 | even |\n| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |\n| Maintenance \u0026 community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 70 | 78 | Paperclip +8 |\n| Transparency \u0026 trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 54 | 66 | Paperclip +12 |\n| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -15 | |\n| **Total** | | **53.9 · D** | **52.6 · D** | |\n\n## Facts side by side\n\n| Fact | Emdash | Paperclip |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |\n| Vendor | General Action, Inc. | Paperclip Labs, Inc. |\n| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |\n| Transports | | |\n| Auth | None | OAuth or key |\n| Pricing | Free | Free |\n| x402 | no | no |\n| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |\n| Read-only variant documented | no | no |\n| llms.txt | no | yes |\n| Last release | 2026-11-06 | 2026-10-23 |\n| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2026-07-23 |\n| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-07-23 |\n| Customer content may train models | not read yet | yes, with an opt-out |\n| Terms restrict automated access | not read yet | not found in the text |\n| Terms restrict benchmarking | not read yet | not found in the text |\n| Terms or service can change without notice | not read yet | not found in the text |\n| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not read yet | yes |\n| Popularity | none | 99k stars, 60k npm/wk |\n\n## How the scores have moved\n\n### Emdash\n\nNo score change since it was listed.\n\n### Paperclip\n\n- -6.4 on 4 November 2026 (C to D): correction\n- no change on 27 October 2026: checklist\n\n## Verdicts\n\n**Emdash.** A mature open-source app for parallel coding agents in Git worktrees, with issue intake from a dozen trackers and remote machines over SSH. Telemetry is on unless you turn it off, and no test workflow was found in the repository.\n\n**Paperclip.** Board approvals, budgets with a hard stop and an activity log sit above whichever harnesses do the work, with ten stable versions in 90 days. The Claude Code and Codex adapters skip permission prompts and the sandbox by default, twelve security advisories have appeared since April 2026, and a 24 October cross-company read fix is in no stable release.\n\n## Before you call either\n\n### Emdash\n\n1. Launch with TELEMETRY_ENABLED=false if you don't want telemetry\n2. Use the SSH mode to keep agents on a remote machine\n\n### Paperclip\n\n1. Set `PAPERCLIP_TELEMETRY_DISABLED=1` or `DO_NOT_TRACK=1` before the first start. Telemetry is on by default\n2. Set `dangerouslySkipPermissions` and `dangerouslyBypassApprovalsAndSandbox` to false on agents that read untrusted input, or run them in a sandbox provider\n3. Install with Node.js 24.11 or newer, and install and sign in to each harness CLI on the host first. Paperclip assumes they are there\n4. Use `--bind lan` or `--bind tailnet` at onboarding for anything beyond one machine. The default `local_trusted` mode treats every request as the board admin\n5. Treat 409 on task checkout as owned by another agent and pick different work. The API docs say not to retry\n\n## Questions\n\n### Which is better for AI agents, Emdash or Paperclip?\n\nEmdash scores 53.9 (D) on agent readiness against Paperclip's 52.6 (D), and leads in 0 of 7 scored categories. Paperclip leads on schema \u0026 documentation, agent ergonomics, security \u0026 auth, maintenance \u0026 community and transparency \u0026 trust.\n\n### Are Emdash and Paperclip open source?\n\nYes. Emdash is open source (Apache-2.0). Paperclip is open source (MIT).\n\n\n## For agents\n\n- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-paperclip.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-paperclip.min.md\n- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {\"a\": \"emdash\", \"b\": \"paperclip\"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare emdash paperclip`\n- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/emdash.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/paperclip.json\n\n## Other comparisons with Emdash or Paperclip\n\n- [Agent Zero vs Emdash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/agent-zero-vs-emdash.md)\n- [Aider vs Emdash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/aider-vs-emdash.md)\n- [Amp vs Emdash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-emdash.md)\n- [Antigravity CLI vs Emdash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antigravity-cli-vs-emdash.md)\n- [Auggie CLI vs Emdash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/auggie-vs-emdash.md)\n- [AXLR vs Emdash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axlr-vs-emdash.md)\n- [Claude Code vs Emdash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-code-vs-emdash.md)\n- [Cline vs Emdash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cline-vs-emdash.md)\n- [Conductor vs Emdash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/conductor-vs-emdash.md)\n- [Crush vs Emdash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crush-vs-emdash.md)\n- [Cursor CLI vs Emdash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cursor-cli-vs-emdash.md)\n- [DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Emdash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-emdash.md)\n- [dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Emdash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-superagent-vs-emdash.md)\n- [Devin vs Emdash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devin-vs-emdash.md)\n- [Droid CLI vs Emdash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/droid-cli-vs-emdash.md)\n- [Pi vs Emdash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/earendil-pi-vs-emdash.md)\n- [Emdash vs Gemini CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-gemini-cli.md)\n- [Emdash vs GitHub Copilot CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-github-copilot-cli.md)\n- [Emdash vs goose](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-goose.md)\n- [Emdash vs Harness²](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-harness2.md)\n- [Emdash vs HarnessRouter](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-harnessrouter.md)\n- [Emdash vs Jules](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-jules.md)\n- [Emdash vs Junie CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-junie.md)\n- [Emdash vs Kilo Code CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-kilo-code-cli.md)\n- [Emdash vs Kimi Code CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-kimi-code-cli.md)\n- [Emdash vs Kiro CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-kiro-cli.md)\n- [Emdash vs Letta](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-letta.md)\n- [Emdash vs mini-swe-agent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-mini-swe-agent.md)\n- [Emdash vs MiniMax Code](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-minimax-code.md)\n- [Emdash vs Mistral Vibe CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-mistral-vibe-cli.md)\n- [Emdash vs Muse Code](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-muse-code.md)\n- [Emdash vs OpenAI Agents API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-openai-agents-api.md)\n- [Emdash vs OpenAI Codex](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-openai-codex.md)\n- [Emdash vs OpenCode](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-opencode.md)\n- [Emdash vs OpenHands](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-openhands.md)\n- [Emdash vs OpenMausBot](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-openmausbot.md)\n- [Emdash vs Orca](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-orca.md)\n- [Emdash vs Paseo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-paseo.md)\n- [Emdash vs Prime Agent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-prime-agent.md)\n- [Emdash vs Qoder CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-qoder-cli.md)\n- [Emdash vs Qwen Code](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-qwen-code.md)\n- [Emdash vs Mirror CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-reflection-mirror.md)\n- [Emdash vs Rovo Dev CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-rovo-dev-cli.md)\n- [Emdash vs Sculptor](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-sculptor.md)\n- [Emdash vs T3 Code](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-t3-code.md)\n- [Emdash vs Traycer](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-traycer.md)\n- [Emdash vs Unstoppable](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-unstoppable.md)\n- [Emdash vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Emdash vs Vibe-Trading](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-vibe-trading.md)\n- [Emdash vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-warp.md)\n- [Amp vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amp-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Antigravity CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/antigravity-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Auggie CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/auggie-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [AXLR vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/axlr-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Claude Code vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/claude-code-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Clawboo vs Emdash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-emdash.md)\n- [Clawboo vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/clawboo-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [CLI Manager vs Emdash](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-emdash.md)\n- [CLI Manager vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cli-manager-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Cline vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cline-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Conductor vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/conductor-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Crush vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crush-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-harness-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-superagent-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Devin vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devin-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Droid CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/droid-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Emdash vs Harness](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-harness-autonomous.md)\n- [Emdash vs Parallax](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-parallax-agents.md)\n- [Gemini CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [GitHub Copilot CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/github-copilot-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [goose vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/goose-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Harness vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harness-autonomous-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [HarnessRouter vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/harnessrouter-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Jules vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/jules-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Junie CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/junie-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Kilo Code CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kilo-code-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Kimi Code CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kimi-code-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Kiro CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/kiro-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Letta vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/letta-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [MiniMax Code vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/minimax-code-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Mistral Vibe CLI vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mistral-vibe-cli-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Muse Code vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/muse-code-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [OpenCode vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/opencode-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [OpenHands vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openhands-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [OpenMausBot vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openmausbot-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Orca vs Paperclip](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/orca-vs-paperclip.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Parallax](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-parallax-agents.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Paseo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-paseo.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Prime Agent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-prime-agent.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Qoder CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-qoder-cli.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Qwen Code](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-qwen-code.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Mirror CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-reflection-mirror.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Rovo Dev CLI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-rovo-dev-cli.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Sculptor](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-sculptor.md)\n- [Paperclip vs T3 Code](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-t3-code.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Traycer](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-traycer.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Unstoppable](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-unstoppable.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Verdent](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-verdent.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Vibe-Trading](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-vibe-trading.md)\n- [Paperclip vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/paperclip-vs-warp.md)\n", "meta": { "attribution": "Anchor Terminal (https://www.anchorterminal.com)", "attributionRequired": true, "credit": "CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link the page or API address you took it from (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)", "docs": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/docs/", "generatedAt": "2026-11-07", "license": "CC-BY-4.0", "method": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/benchmark/", "methodology": "0.7", "openapi": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/openapi.json", "preview": false, "run": "2026-10-01", "runLabel": "October 2026 research run", "terms": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data" }, "page": { "breadcrumbs": [ { "name": "Home", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/" }, { "name": "Compare", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/" }, { "name": "Emdash vs Paperclip", "url": "" } ], "description": "Emdash scores 53.9 (D) to Paperclip's 52.6 (D) for multi-agent orchestration. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.", "facts": [ "Emdash D 53.9", "Paperclip D 52.6", "scores" ], "h1": "Emdash vs Paperclip", "image": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/assets/og/default.png", "path": "/compare/emdash-vs-paperclip", "published": "2026-10-01", "section": "tools", "title": "Emdash vs Paperclip for AI agents in 2026: scores and prices", "toc": null, "updated": "2026-11-07", "url": "https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/emdash-vs-paperclip" }, "tokens": { "markdown": 5450, "slim": 2080 }, "version": 1 }