# Eden AI vs Tencent Hy4 (slim)

> Tencent Hy4 scores 64 (B) to Eden AI's 61.8 (C) for llm inference. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/eden-ai-vs-hy4.md (~5,850 tokens) · this version ~880 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/eden-ai-vs-hy4.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/eden-ai-vs-hy4
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-13
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Tencent Hy4 scores 64 (B) on agent readiness against Eden AI's 61.8 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Eden AI leads on schema & documentation and security & auth. Both do llm inference.

- Eden AI: C 61.8, rank #694 of 1524 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/eden-ai.min.md
- Tencent Hy4: B 64, rank #595 of 1524 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/hy4.min.md
- Eden AI, good for Teams that want one key and bill for many LLMs plus OCR, speech, translation and web tools, with EU-only processing. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 81 against 73; Security & auth, 82 against 71. Also A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install.
- Tencent Hy4, good for Long-context agent work, coding and office or finance tasks on a 1M-token context with images, for teams already on Tencent Cloud or happy to verify an account there. Ahead on Reliability, 46 against 33; Agent ergonomics, 86 against 75; Maintenance & community, 73 against 58.

| Category | Eden AI | Tencent Hy4 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 33 | 46 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 81 | 73 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 75 | 86 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 82 | 71 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 45 | 45 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 58 | 73 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 55 | 52 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Eden AI | Tencent Hy4 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | Model router | Model API |
| Vendor | Eden AI SAS | Tencent (Hy team) |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://mcp.edenai.run/mcp` | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP |
| Licence | none | Hosted model under the Tencent Cloud TokenHub terms. Tencent says weights and a system card will follow; no licence is stated yet |
| Last release | 2026-11-05 | 2026-11-04 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-22 | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-22 | couldn't be read |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | couldn't be read |

Why the edge:
- Maintenance & community, Tencent Hy4 +15: Eden AI 58 (Closed service, read on the model lines.); Tencent Hy4 73 (Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub.)
- Reliability, Tencent Hy4 +13: Eden AI 33 (Router, read on the hosted lines.); Tencent Hy4 46 (Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub.)
- Agent ergonomics, Tencent Hy4 +11: Eden AI 75 (Router, read on the model lines.); Tencent Hy4 86 (Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub.)
- Security & auth, Eden AI +11: Eden AI 82 (Router, read on the model lines.); Tencent Hy4 71 (Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub.)
- Schema & documentation, Eden AI +8: Eden AI 81 (Router, scored on the API lines.); Tencent Hy4 73 (Model reading for hy4 on Tencent Cloud TokenHub.)