# E2B vs Runloop Devboxes (slim)

> E2B has a score of 68.5 (B) against Runloop Devboxes's 65 (B). Both do sandbox code. The largest gap is transparency & trust, 20 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/e2b-vs-runloop.md (~1,350 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/e2b-vs-runloop.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/e2b-vs-runloop
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

E2B has a score of 68.5 (B) against Runloop Devboxes's 65 (B). Both do sandbox code. The largest gap is transparency & trust, 20 points.

- E2B: B 68.5, rank #122 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/e2b.min.md
- Runloop Devboxes: B 65, rank #177 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/runloop.min.md
- Pick E2B for schema & documentation (+7), maintenance & community (+5), transparency & trust (+20). Pick Runloop Devboxes for nothing in particular.

| Category | E2B | Runloop Devboxes |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 60 | 60 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 92 | 85 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 65 | 66 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 62 | 60 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 50 | 50 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 88 | 83 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 71 | 51 |