# E2B vs Modal Sandboxes (slim)

> Modal Sandboxes has a score of 75.6 (BB) against E2B's 68.5 (B). Both do sandbox code. The largest gap is reliability, 35 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/e2b-vs-modal-sandboxes.md (~1,350 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/e2b-vs-modal-sandboxes.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/e2b-vs-modal-sandboxes
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

Modal Sandboxes has a score of 75.6 (BB) against E2B's 68.5 (B). Both do sandbox code. The largest gap is reliability, 35 points.

- E2B: B 68.5, rank #122 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/e2b.min.md
- Modal Sandboxes: BB 75.6, rank #33 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/modal-sandboxes.min.md
- Pick E2B for schema & documentation (+13), payments & pricing (+10). Pick Modal Sandboxes for reliability (+35), security & auth (+14), maintenance & community (+5).

| Category | E2B | Modal Sandboxes |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 60 | 95 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 92 | 79 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 65 | 67 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 62 | 76 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 50 | 40 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 88 | 93 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 71 | 74 |