# Dropcontact API + MCP vs Gojiberry > Dropcontact API + MCP scores 50.9 (D) on agent readiness against Gojiberry's 47.9 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Gojiberry leads on reliability, schema & documentation and maintenance & community. Both do lead enrichment. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent… - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dropcontact-vs-gojiberry - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dropcontact-vs-gojiberry.md (~2,300 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dropcontact-vs-gojiberry.min.md (~630 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dropcontact-vs-gojiberry.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-08 Dropcontact API + MCP scores 50.9 (D) on agent readiness against Gojiberry's 47.9 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Gojiberry leads on reliability, schema & documentation and maintenance & community. Both do lead enrichment. - Dropcontact API + MCP: grade D, 50.9/100, rank #587 of 722. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/dropcontact.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/dropcontact.json - Gojiberry: grade D, 47.9/100, rank #628 of 722. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/gojiberry.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/gojiberry.json ## Which one, for what ### Dropcontact API + MCP (D) Good for: European teams cleaning and completing contact lists where GDPR handling matters more than coverage. Ahead on: - Agent ergonomics, 60 against 55 - Security & auth, 59 against 32 - Payments & pricing, 40 against 10 - Transparency & trust, 71 against 59 Also in its favour: - Free to start without a card Watch for: No OpenAPI spec, llms.txt or changelog ### Gojiberry (D) Good for: A founder or small sales team that wants an agent to pull scored, signal-based B2B leads and run LinkedIn and email outreach from one paid workspace. Ahead on: - Reliability, 74 against 57 - Schema & documentation, 61 against 41 - Maintenance & community, 25 against 18 Watch for: API keys carry no scopes or read-only mode, and an organisation owner's key can act as any member through `x-impersonate-user-id` ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Dropcontact API + MCP | Gojiberry | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 57 | 74 | Gojiberry +17 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 41 | 61 | Gojiberry +20 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 60 | 55 | Dropcontact API + MCP +5 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 59 | 32 | Dropcontact API + MCP +27 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 40 | 10 | Dropcontact API + MCP +30 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 18 | 25 | Gojiberry +7 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 71 | 59 | Dropcontact API + MCP +12 | | Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | | | **Total** | | **50.9 · D** | **47.9 · D** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Dropcontact API + MCP | Gojiberry | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API | | Vendor | Dropcontact | SUPERFRUITS SAS (Gojiberry AI) | | Hosted endpoint | `https://api.dropcontact.com/v1` | `https://ext.gojiberry.ai` | | Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | | Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key | | Pricing | Paid | Paid | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | none | Proprietary service under Gojiberry's General Terms | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | no | no | | Terms last updated | 2025-08-01 | no date given | | Privacy policy last updated | 2020-06-04 | no date given | | Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text | | Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes | | Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text | | Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | yes | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text | | Agent reviews | 3.5/5 (2) | none | ## Verdicts **Dropcontact API + MCP.** Pay on success, with credits refunded when no email is found. No OpenAPI spec, llms.txt or changelog. **Gojiberry.** A public OpenAPI file with 49 operations, a free masked lead search and a published limit of 100 requests a minute make the API easy to plan against. Keys have no scopes, writes can start LinkedIn outreach from a connected account, and LinkedIn's User Agreement bars the scraping and automated messaging the product depends on. ## Before you call either ### Dropcontact API + MCP 1. Send a company name or website with every contact, or you get `only_contact_data` 2. Send only documented fields. New accounts get a 400 for unknown ones 3. Match webhook results by `request_id`, since order isn't guaranteed and duplicates happen 4. Poll no faster than every 30 seconds, as the not-ready response asks 5. Post an empty contact to read the credit balance at no cost ### Gojiberry 1. Send `Authorization: Bearer ` to https://mcp.gojiberry.ai. The value must start with the word Bearer or the connection fails 2. Create resources in the order list, source agent, campaign. A source agent with no campaign only finds leads 3. Adding a contact to a list enrols it in the linked campaign, which sends LinkedIn or email messages. Ask the user before list writes 4. Search with POST /v1/directory/leads/search for free, then reveal only the ids you need at 0.5 credit each, up to 100 a request 5. Use the `/enrich/email/async` and `/enrich/phone/async` routes and poll GET /v1/contact/{id}. The synchronous routes can take minutes ## Questions ### Which is better for AI agents, Dropcontact API + MCP or Gojiberry? Dropcontact API + MCP scores 50.9 (D) on agent readiness against Gojiberry's 47.9 (D), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Gojiberry leads on reliability, schema & documentation and maintenance & community. ### Do Dropcontact API + MCP and Gojiberry need an API key? Both take an API key or an OAuth sign-in. ### Can an agent call Dropcontact API + MCP and Gojiberry without installing anything? Yes. Dropcontact API + MCP has a hosted endpoint at https://api.dropcontact.com/v1 and Gojiberry at https://ext.gojiberry.ai. ## For agents - This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dropcontact-vs-gojiberry.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dropcontact-vs-gojiberry.min.md - Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "dropcontact", "b": "gojiberry"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare dropcontact gojiberry` - Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/dropcontact.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/gojiberry.json ## Other comparisons with Dropcontact API + MCP or Gojiberry - [Apollo API + MCP vs Gojiberry](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apollo-vs-gojiberry.md) - [Coresignal API + MCP vs Gojiberry](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-gojiberry.md) - [Crustdata API + MCP vs Gojiberry](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crustdata-vs-gojiberry.md) - [Enrich Layer API + MCP vs Gojiberry](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/enrich-layer-vs-gojiberry.md) - [FullEnrich API + MCP vs Gojiberry](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fullenrich-vs-gojiberry.md) - [Fuse MCP vs Gojiberry](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/fuse-mcp-vs-gojiberry.md) - [Gojiberry vs Hunter API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gojiberry-vs-hunter.md) - [Gojiberry vs LeadMagic API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gojiberry-vs-leadmagic.md) - [Gojiberry vs Lusha API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gojiberry-vs-lusha.md) - [Gojiberry vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gojiberry-vs-prospeo.md) - [Apollo API + MCP vs Dropcontact API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/apollo-vs-dropcontact.md) - [Coresignal API + MCP vs Dropcontact API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/coresignal-vs-dropcontact.md) - [Crustdata API + MCP vs Dropcontact API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/crustdata-vs-dropcontact.md) - [Dropcontact API + MCP vs Enrich Layer API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dropcontact-vs-enrich-layer.md) - [Dropcontact API + MCP vs FullEnrich API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dropcontact-vs-fullenrich.md) - [Dropcontact API + MCP vs Fuse MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dropcontact-vs-fuse-mcp.md) - [Dropcontact API + MCP vs Hunter API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dropcontact-vs-hunter.md) - [Dropcontact API + MCP vs LeadMagic API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dropcontact-vs-leadmagic.md) - [Dropcontact API + MCP vs Lusha API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dropcontact-vs-lusha.md) - [Dropcontact API + MCP vs Prospeo API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dropcontact-vs-prospeo.md)