# DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B (slim)

> MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B scores 61 (C) to DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT's 51.3 (D) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/diffusiongemma-26b-a4b-it-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b.md (~10,150 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/diffusiongemma-26b-a4b-it-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/diffusiongemma-26b-a4b-it-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT's 51.3 (D), and leads in 2 of 4 scored categories. DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT leads on risk. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT: D 51.3, rank #143 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/diffusiongemma-26b-a4b-it.min.md
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B: C 61, rank #77 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b.min.md
- DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT, good for Agents with about 64 GB of GPU memory that want fast single-user generation from text and images and can accept lower quality than Gemma 4 Ahead on Risk, 70 against 55.
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B, good for Agents that need to read screenshots, documents and video on a local machine with 24 to 32 GB for the model, under a permissive licence Ahead on Reach, 90 against 55; Documentation and upkeep, 68 against 60.

| Category | DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 55 | 90 |
| Risk (20%) | 70 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 70 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 60 | 68 |

| Fact (where they differ) | DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Google DeepMind | OpenBMB |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-07-15 | 2026-11-03 |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | none |

Why the edge:
- Reach, MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +35: DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT 55 (Memory earns 15 because the only Google build is 51.7 GB of BF16, about 62 GB with the fifth added, which needs the 64 GB band.); MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 90 (Memory 25, since OpenBMB's IQ4_XS GGUF with its vision projector is 19.6 GB and needs about 23.6 GB with the fifth added, which fits 24 GB, while its Q4_K_M GGU…)
- Risk, DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT +15: DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT 70 (File safety gets the full 25, safetensors only and loaded by Transformers' own code and a Jinja template.); MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 55 (File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only, no Python in the main repository and no remote code needed.)
- Documentation and upkeep, MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +8: DiffusionGemma 26B A4B IT 60 (The card covers all seven points (20), and the training data is a general description with a January 2025 cut-off (10).); MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 68 (Model card 8, it covers intended use, architecture and parameters but not limitations, context length, languages or a knowledge cut-off.)