# Dievio vs Dropcontact API + MCP (slim)

> Dropcontact scores 51 (D) to Dievio's 43 (E) for lead enrichment. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dievio-vs-dropcontact.md (~5,200 tokens) · this version ~2,980 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dievio-vs-dropcontact.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/dievio-vs-dropcontact
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-31
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Dropcontact API + MCP scores 51 (D) on agent readiness against Dievio's 43 (E), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Dievio leads on schema & documentation and maintenance & community. Both do lead enrichment.

- Dievio: E 43, rank #1090 of 1245 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/dievio.min.md
- Dropcontact API + MCP: D 51, rank #927 of 1245 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/dropcontact.min.md
- Dievio, good for Agents building small prospect lists by title, seniority, department, location, company size and industry at a low published price per lead, previewing the count for free first, and handing the user a CSV, JSON or JSONL file from a shared list without opening the dashboard. Ahead on Schema & documentation, 50 against 41; Maintenance & community, 28 against 18.
- Dropcontact API + MCP, good for European teams cleaning and completing contact lists where GDPR handling matters more than coverage. Ahead on Reliability, 57 against 28; Payments & pricing, 40 against 35; Transparency & trust, 72 against 27.

| Category | Dievio | Dropcontact API + MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 28 | 57 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 50 | 41 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 63 | 60 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 56 | 59 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 35 | 40 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 28 | 18 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 27 | 72 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Dievio | Dropcontact API + MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Dievio | Dropcontact |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://dievio.com/api/public` | `https://api.dropcontact.com/v1` |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| Licence | Proprietary hosted service under Dievio's Terms of Service (last updated 31 October 2026). No source is published; the only public code is a third-party MIT OpenClaw skill and an n8n template on GitHub | none |
| Tools exposed | 30 | none |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Terms last updated | not read yet | 2025-08-01 |
| Privacy policy last updated | not read yet | 2020-06-04 |
| Customer content may train models | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not read yet | not found in the text |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.5/5 (2) |

Why the edge:
- Transparency & trust, Dropcontact API + MCP +45: Dievio 27 (Closed service. The terms (last updated 31 October 2026) cover use, credits, connected agents, a 30-day refund and availability in about 300 words but name no legal entity, address, governing law or jurisdiction, so the contracting party is unknown (8 of 30). The privacy policy (31 October 2026) lists the categories processed, the purposes, recipients by category, the agent connection data, and the access periods (authorization requests 10 minutes, codes 5, access tokens an hour, refresh 30 days, export links 15 minutes), says lead search uses Dievio's own contact database without saying where records are collected from, lets people in the database ask for access, correction, deletion or suppression by email, keeps records for as long as needed with no periods, and agrees with the terms and the docs on credits, revocation and link expiry; no DPA was found (14 of 30). No deprecation policy or notices; the terms allow the service to change at any time, and plan allowances and API prices changed between the 20 May and 31 October 2026 copies of the pricing pages with no dated notice (0 of 20). Service providers are named by category only (hosting, databases, authentication, contact processing, analytics, email delivery, payments), with no names, locations or transfer basis (4 of 20). 8+14+0+4 = 26.); Dropcontact API + MCP 72 (Closed service with terms naming Dropcontact SAS, registered in Bobigny, no. 823 752 647 (15). The personal data charter (updated 5 August 2025) says Dropcontact is a processor when enriching for a customer, keeps prospect data 3 years plus 4 in intermediate storage, takes rights requests at data@dropcontact.io, and a DPA is published. The pricing page says enrichment runs on its own algorithms on EU servers, while the charter says data is collected from public sources and some subcontractors are in the US under SCCs (22 of 30). One dated change notice (June 2026) and no deprecation policy (8 of 20). EU hosting and US subcontractors stated, no named subprocessor list found (10 of 20).)
- Reliability, Dropcontact API + MCP +29: Dievio 28 (Hosted reading, for the REST API with the MCP server it shares a database with. No public status page was found. None is linked from the docs or the footer, https://dievio.com/status answers 404 and status.dievio.com does not resolve (0). No readable incident history, so the floor (5). No rate limit is published for the REST API or the MCP tools. The only numbers are the export cap of 10 download starts a minute per connection and 100,000 contacts a file, the OAuth timers and input bounds such as 500 LinkedIn URLs a call, and the privacy policy mentions hashed rate-limit keys without a figure (5 of 15). No 429 or Retry-After is documented, and the REST errors are 401, 402, 500 and 502 with no retry guidance; every MCP mutation takes a request_id UUID replayed when retried with identical arguments, the workflows page says never to repeat a paid lookup with a new ID and to reconcile against the job list first, and a low balance returns fewer rows rather than failing, while a retried REST search has no idempotency key and is charged again (8 of 15). No SLA. The terms (last updated 31 October 2026) say uptime is not guaranteed and the service may change at any time (0). The REST API and the 30-tool MCP server carry no beta label, though the search response documents `search_id` as currently null and `counting` as currently false, and the server is unversioned (10). 0+5+5+8+0+10 = 28.); Dropcontact API + MCP 57 (Atlassian Statuspage at status.dropcontact.com with a separate Dropcontact API component (20). The front page shows no incidents from 17 September to 1 October. The history page renders client-side and we couldn't read July or August, so this is two clean weeks, not 90 days (10). 60 requests a second, 250 contacts a request and 15 kB a contact (15). 429 is documented without Retry-After. Results not ready return 'try again in 30 seconds', and the docs warn that webhooks can arrive out of order or twice (7 of 15). No SLA found (0). The REST API is generally available, while the vendor calls remote MCP connections 'still early' (5 of 10).)
- Maintenance & community, Dievio +10: Dievio 28 (Closed service with no changelog, release notes or version numbers. The latest dated changes on the vendor's pages are the terms and privacy policy of 31 October 2026, which describe the agent integration, token lifetimes and export expiry, and blog posts of 21 and 30 October 2026 on API billing; the MCP server, absent from the February and May 2026 archived copies, carries no date, and the API landing pages say content reviewed May 2026 (20 of 30). No release record, so no three dated entries in 90 days; 84 dated blog posts from 29 March to 30 October 2026 are articles, not releases (0). Support is one address, support@dievio.com, with email support on Starter and priority support on Growth; no public changelog, community channel, forum or issue tracker, and the Fazier launch page's comments are from other makers (3 of 15). Not in the official MCP registry and no official SDKs (0). No packages to judge (5 of 10). 20+0+3+0+5 = 28.); Dropcontact API + MCP 18 (No changelog. The newest dated API change we found is the June 2026 switch to 400 errors for unknown fields, between 90 and 180 days ago (10). No dated release entries in the last 90 days (0). Email support on every plan and no public changelog (5 of 15). Not in the official MCP registry and no official SDKs (0). No packages to judge (3 of 10).)
- Schema & documentation, Dievio +9: Dievio 50 (API reading, with the MCP server described. No OpenAPI or other machine-readable contract for the REST API; the MCP tool reference says clients discover exact input schemas through tools/list, that unknown fields and unlisted arguments are rejected, and the server publishes a dievio://schema/search-filters JSON resource, but no session was opened to read them (10 of 25). llms.txt and llms-full.txt on docs.dievio.com, generated on each build, plus llms.txt, pricing.md and product.md on dievio.com (10). The MCP reference says what each tool does, which tools are free, which scope each needs, when to prefer export_list_file over export_list and how to retry; the REST pages say what each endpoint returns and little about when to use search against lookup, and the MCP page says a preview does not unlock contacts and a count is not a guaranteed result (12 of 20). Filters are typed as strings, string arrays, booleans and integers with enumerations listed for seniority, department, employee size, business model, salary and email_status, bounds on page, limit, max_results and array length, and UUID ids; industries and locations are examples only, the funding dates are a year over REST and an ISO date over MCP, and the contact object for add_leads_to_list carries a free JSON lead_data field (10 of 15). curl examples with example responses for both REST endpoints, a pagination loop and six MCP worked prompts; errors are four status codes with one line each and no documented body, and the MCP error shape is not shown (8 of 15). No version in the path (/api/public), no changelog or release notes on either host, and plan allowances and API prices changed between the May and October 2026 copies of the pricing pages with no dated notice (0 of 15). 10+10+12+10+8+0 = 50.); Dropcontact API + MCP 41 (No OpenAPI or other machine-readable spec found (0). No llms.txt found (0). The single-page reference says what the enrich call needs, a name plus a company identifier, and what comes back (14 of 20). Documented input fields, and since June 2026 unknown fields get a 400 on new accounts (10 of 15). Request and response examples, HTTP codes and per-contact error and warning codes such as `only_contact_data` and `unexpected_field` (12 of 15). /v1 in the path and no public changelog (5 of 15).)
- Payments & pricing, Dropcontact API + MCP +5: Dievio 35 (No x402, MPP or L402 in the docs, the pricing pages or the terms (0). Prices published without a login as dollars per 1,000 API credits ($4.50 at 5,000 down to $2.92 at 60,000), per plan ($29.99, $79.99 and $149.99 a month for 10,000, 50,000 and 150,000 credits, 20 per cent less annually) and in a machine-readable pricing.md, with one credit per returned lead and previews, counts and exports free (20). Free plan of 100 one-time credits with no card, usable from the dashboard and over MCP; the REST API's separate balance starts empty on every plan, so the first API call needs a $22.50 top-up (15 of 20). A person signs up in a browser, and the OAuth consent and API key creation both need the dashboard (0). 0+20+15+0 = 35.); Dropcontact API + MCP 40 (No x402, MPP or L402 (0). Plan prices and credit allowances are public in euros, and a credit is one verified email found (refunded when none is) or one email checked, so the unit price is clear (20). 50 free credits at signup with no card (20). A person signs up in a browser (0).)