# Didit vs Trulioo (slim)

> Didit scores 75 (BB) on agent readiness against Trulioo's 58.2 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Trulioo leads on agent ergonomics. Both do kyc identity. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/didit-vs-trulioo.md (~2,250 tokens) · this version ~830 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/didit-vs-trulioo.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/didit-vs-trulioo
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-08

Didit scores 75 (BB) on agent readiness against Trulioo's 58.2 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Trulioo leads on agent ergonomics. Both do kyc identity.

- Didit: BB 75, rank #54 of 722 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/didit.min.md
- Trulioo: C 58.2, rank #457 of 722 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/trulioo.min.md
- Didit, good for A team that wants document, liveness, screening and business registry checks from one API with public prices and no sales step, and an agent that has to set itself up. Ahead on Reliability, 80 against 19; Payments & pricing, 60 against 18; Maintenance & community, 82 against 75; Transparency & trust, 63 against 56. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better; Runs on your own machine; Free to start without a card.
- Trulioo, good for An agent doing business due diligence (search, verification, ownership, reports) or person checks across many countries for a company that already has a Trulioo contract, and for teams that want to test verification flows against synthetic data first. Ahead on Agent ergonomics, 78 against 69.

| Category | Didit | Trulioo |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 80 | 19 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 88 | 87 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 69 | 78 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 76 | 79 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 60 | 18 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 82 | 75 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 63 | 56 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Didit | Trulioo |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Didit Identity Spain, S.L. | Trulioo Information Services Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://verification.didit.me` | `https://api.trulioo.com` |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Paid |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Didit's Business Terms and Conditions. The MCP server in didit-protocol/mcp is MIT | Proprietary service under a customer agreement that isn't public. The MCP plugin and the C# and Java REST SDKs on GitHub are Apache-2.0, and the capture SDKs fall under the Trulioo SDK Licence |
| Tools exposed | 156 | 18 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| MCP registry | `me.didit/mcp` | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-07 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-09-23 | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-07 | 2025-10-01 |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text |  |
| Popularity | 0 stars, 27k npm/wk | 0 stars, 131 npm/wk |