# Didit vs Shufti (slim) > Didit scores 75 (BB) on agent readiness against Shufti's 57.8 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Shufti leads on transparency & trust. Both do kyc identity. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/didit-vs-shufti.md (~2,250 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/didit-vs-shufti.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/didit-vs-shufti - Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09 Didit scores 75 (BB) on agent readiness against Shufti's 57.8 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Shufti leads on transparency & trust. Both do kyc identity. - Didit: BB 75, rank #60 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/didit.min.md - Shufti: C 57.8, rank #538 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/shufti.min.md - Didit, good for A team that wants document, liveness, screening and business registry checks from one API with public prices and no sales step, and an agent that has to set itself up. Ahead on Reliability, 80 against 65; Schema & documentation, 88 against 58; Agent ergonomics, 69 against 47; Security & auth, 76 against 62; Payments & pricing, 60 against 35; Maintenance & community, 82 against 72. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better; Runs on your own machine. - Shufti, good for A team that wants document, face, address, AML and KYB checks behind one endpoint, a free plan for low volume, and an MCP server that hands the person a hosted verification link. Ahead on Transparency & trust, 71 against 63. | Category | Didit | Shufti | | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability (16%) | 80 | 65 | | Performance (10%) | pending | pending | | Schema & documentation (13%) | 88 | 58 | | Agent ergonomics (13%) | 69 | 47 | | Security & auth (14%) | 76 | 62 | | Payments & pricing (10%) | 60 | 35 | | Task success (10%) | pending | pending | | Maintenance & community (7%) | 82 | 72 | | Transparency & trust (7%) | 63 | 71 | | Fact (where they differ) | Didit | Shufti | | --- | --- | --- | | Vendor | Didit Identity Spain, S.L. | Shufti Pro Limited | | Hosted endpoint | `https://verification.didit.me` | `https://api.shuftipro.com` | | Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | | Pricing | Pay per use | Freemium | | Licence | Proprietary service under Didit's Business Terms and Conditions. The MCP server in didit-protocol/mcp is MIT | Proprietary service under Shufti's Terms and Conditions. The licences of the mobile capture SDKs were not checked | | Tools exposed | 156 | 25 | | MCP registry | `me.didit/mcp` | not listed | | Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-06 | | Terms last updated | 2026-09-23 | | | Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-07 | 2026-09-01 | | Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | | | Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | | | Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | | | Popularity | 0 stars, 27k npm/wk | 673 npm/wk |