# Didit vs Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) (slim)

> Didit scores 75 (BB) to Entrust Identity Verification's 62.1 (B) for identity verification. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/didit-vs-entrust-identity-verification.md (~3,000 tokens) · this version ~830 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/didit-vs-entrust-identity-verification.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/didit-vs-entrust-identity-verification
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-14

Didit scores 75 (BB) on agent readiness against Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido)'s 62.1 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) leads on transparency & trust. Both do identity verification.

- Didit: BB 75, rank #63 of 1076 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/didit.min.md
- Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido): B 62.1, rank #472 of 1076 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/entrust-identity-verification.min.md
- Didit, good for A team that wants document, liveness, screening and business registry checks from one API with public prices and no sales step, and an agent that has to set itself up. Ahead on Reliability, 80 against 70; Security & auth, 76 against 58; Payments & pricing, 60 against 20; Maintenance & community, 82 against 58. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better; A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install; Runs on your own machine; Free to start without a card.
- Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido), good for A company already contracted with Entrust that wants an agent to create applicants, start workflow runs and read reports through typed libraries and a public spec. Ahead on Transparency & trust, 70 against 63.

| Category | Didit | Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 80 | 70 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 88 | 84 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 69 | 65 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 76 | 58 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 60 | 20 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 82 | 58 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 63 | 70 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Didit | Entrust Identity Verification (formerly Onfido) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Didit Identity Spain, S.L. | Onfido Ltd (Entrust) |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://verification.didit.me` | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio | HTTP |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Paid |
| Licence | Proprietary service under Didit's Business Terms and Conditions. The MCP server in didit-protocol/mcp is MIT | Proprietary service under Entrust's terms. The OpenAPI spec and the server libraries (onfido-java, onfido-node, onfido-php, onfido-python, onfido-ruby) are MIT |
| Tools exposed | 156 | none |
| MCP registry | `me.didit/mcp` | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-08-31 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-09-23 | couldn't be read |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-07 |  |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | couldn't be read |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | couldn't be read |
| Popularity | 0 stars, 27k npm/wk | 59k npm/wk, 27k PyPI/wk |