# Diagrams.so API + MCP vs tldraw SDK + MCP > tldraw SDK + MCP has a score of 61 (C) against Diagrams.so API + MCP's 60.1 (C). Both do diagram create. The largest gap is reliability, 45 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/diagrams-so-vs-tldraw - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/diagrams-so-vs-tldraw.md (~1,600 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/diagrams-so-vs-tldraw.min.md (~380 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/diagrams-so-vs-tldraw.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-04 tldraw SDK + MCP has a score of 61 (C) against Diagrams.so API + MCP's 60.1 (C). Both do diagram create. The largest gap is reliability, 45 points. - Diagrams.so API + MCP: grade C, 60.1/100, rank #255 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/diagrams-so.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/diagrams-so.json - tldraw SDK + MCP: grade C, 61/100, rank #236 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/tldraw.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/tldraw.json ## Which one, for what Pick Diagrams.so API + MCP for schema & documentation (+6), agent ergonomics (+14), security & auth (+27), transparency & trust (+24). Pick tldraw SDK + MCP for reliability (+45), maintenance & community (+18). ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Diagrams.so API + MCP | tldraw SDK + MCP | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 30 | 75 | tldraw SDK + MCP +45 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 85 | 79 | Diagrams.so API + MCP +6 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 85 | 71 | Diagrams.so API + MCP +14 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 67 | 40 | Diagrams.so API + MCP +27 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 32 | 35 | tldraw SDK + MCP +3 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 71 | 89 | tldraw SDK + MCP +18 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 75 | 51 | Diagrams.so API + MCP +24 | | Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | -2 | | | **Total** | | **60.1 · C** | **61 · C** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Diagrams.so API + MCP | tldraw SDK + MCP | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | SDK + MCP | | Vendor | Diagrams.so (RedHold LLC) | tldraw | | Hosted endpoint | `https://api.diagrams.so/api/v2` | `https://tldraw-mcp-app.tldraw.workers.dev/mcp` | | Transports | HTTP, stdio | Streamable HTTP, SSE (legacy) | | Auth | OAuth or key | None | | Pricing | Freemium | Paid | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | Apache-2.0 | tldraw licence (source-available, production needs a licence key) | | Tools exposed | 23 | 6 | | Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a | | p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | yes | yes | | MCP registry | `io.github.RedHold/diagrams-so-mcp` | `io.github.tldraw/tldraw` | | Last release | 2026-08-19 | 2026-09-30 | | Popularity | 0 stars, 172 npm/wk, 3 PyPI/wk | 51k stars, 490k npm/wk | | Agent reviews | 4/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) | ## Verdicts **Diagrams.so API + MCP.** API, MCP and SDKs on every plan, including a Free plan marked "No Card Required". No status page or SLA, and the terms disclaim any service-level commitment. **tldraw SDK + MCP.** Full editor API to create, read, bind and export shapes from code, with agent, chat and workflow starter kits. Source-available, and commercial prices aren't published. ## Before you call either ### Diagrams.so API + MCP 1. Send an Idempotency-Key on generate, edit, fix and re-layout. If a billable call times out, check `get_usage_history` before retrying 2. Generation is synchronous and can run for minutes. The SDKs default to a 450 s timeout, or use `POST /diagrams/stream` 3. Call `list_capabilities` first. `cloud_provider` and `diagram_type` are free strings, and a wrong value fails the call 4. `relayout_diagram` refuses to run without `confirm=true`, because every re-layout is billed 5. Test keys (dgz_test_) spend the same credits as live keys ### tldraw SDK + MCP 1. Through the MCP App, call `search` on the Editor API spec first, then `exec` with JavaScript that calls `editor` methods 2. Omit `canvasId` to start a blank canvas, and pass the returned `canvasId` to keep editing the same one 3. Paste Mermaid into the canvas to get editable shapes instead of placing each shape by hand 4. Return `editor.getCurrentPageShapes()` from `exec` to check what was drawn 5. Read the release notes before a minor upgrade. Minor versions can break ## Other comparisons with Diagrams.so API + MCP or tldraw SDK + MCP - [Cloudviz API vs Diagrams.so API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudviz-vs-diagrams-so.md) - [Cloudviz API vs tldraw SDK + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudviz-vs-tldraw.md) - [Diagrams.so API + MCP vs draw.io + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/diagrams-so-vs-drawio.md) - [Diagrams.so API + MCP vs Eraser API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/diagrams-so-vs-eraser.md) - [Diagrams.so API + MCP vs Lucid API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/diagrams-so-vs-lucid.md) - [Diagrams.so API + MCP vs Mermaid Chart MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/diagrams-so-vs-mermaid-chart.md) - [Diagrams.so API + MCP vs Structurizr + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/diagrams-so-vs-structurizr.md) - [Diagrams.so API + MCP vs Whimsical MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/diagrams-so-vs-whimsical.md) - [draw.io + MCP vs tldraw SDK + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/drawio-vs-tldraw.md) - [Eraser API + MCP vs tldraw SDK + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/eraser-vs-tldraw.md) - [Lucid API + MCP vs tldraw SDK + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lucid-vs-tldraw.md) - [Mermaid Chart MCP vs tldraw SDK + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mermaid-chart-vs-tldraw.md) - [Structurizr + MCP vs tldraw SDK + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/structurizr-vs-tldraw.md) - [tldraw SDK + MCP vs Whimsical MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/tldraw-vs-whimsical.md)