# Diagrams.so API + MCP vs Structurizr + MCP (slim)

> Structurizr + MCP has a score of 60.2 (C) against Diagrams.so API + MCP's 60.1 (C). Both do diagram create. The largest gap is reliability, 43 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/diagrams-so-vs-structurizr.md (~1,600 tokens) · this version ~380 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/diagrams-so-vs-structurizr.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/diagrams-so-vs-structurizr
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-04

Structurizr + MCP has a score of 60.2 (C) against Diagrams.so API + MCP's 60.1 (C). Both do diagram create. The largest gap is reliability, 43 points.

- Diagrams.so API + MCP: C 60.1, rank #255 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/diagrams-so.min.md
- Structurizr + MCP: C 60.2, rank #252 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/structurizr.min.md
- Pick Diagrams.so API + MCP for schema & documentation (+24), agent ergonomics (+30), security & auth (+24). Pick Structurizr + MCP for reliability (+43), payments & pricing (+18), transparency & trust (+5).

| Category | Diagrams.so API + MCP | Structurizr + MCP |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 30 | 73 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 85 | 61 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 85 | 55 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 67 | 43 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 32 | 50 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 71 | 68 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 75 | 80 |