# Diagrams.so API + MCP vs Structurizr + MCP > Structurizr + MCP has a score of 60.2 (C) against Diagrams.so API + MCP's 60.1 (C). Both do diagram create. The largest gap is reliability, 43 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/diagrams-so-vs-structurizr - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/diagrams-so-vs-structurizr.md (~1,600 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/diagrams-so-vs-structurizr.min.md (~380 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/diagrams-so-vs-structurizr.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-04 Structurizr + MCP has a score of 60.2 (C) against Diagrams.so API + MCP's 60.1 (C). Both do diagram create. The largest gap is reliability, 43 points. - Diagrams.so API + MCP: grade C, 60.1/100, rank #255 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/diagrams-so.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/diagrams-so.json - Structurizr + MCP: grade C, 60.2/100, rank #252 of 452. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/structurizr.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/structurizr.json ## Which one, for what Pick Diagrams.so API + MCP for schema & documentation (+24), agent ergonomics (+30), security & auth (+24). Pick Structurizr + MCP for reliability (+43), payments & pricing (+18), transparency & trust (+5). ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Diagrams.so API + MCP | Structurizr + MCP | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 30 | 73 | Structurizr + MCP +43 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 85 | 61 | Diagrams.so API + MCP +24 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 85 | 55 | Diagrams.so API + MCP +30 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 67 | 43 | Diagrams.so API + MCP +24 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 32 | 50 | Structurizr + MCP +18 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 71 | 68 | Diagrams.so API + MCP +3 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 75 | 80 | Structurizr + MCP +5 | | Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | 0 | | | **Total** | | **60.1 · C** | **60.2 · C** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Diagrams.so API + MCP | Structurizr + MCP | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API | | Vendor | Diagrams.so (RedHold LLC) | Structurizr | | Hosted endpoint | `https://api.diagrams.so/api/v2` | `https://mcp.structurizr.com/mcp` | | Transports | HTTP, stdio | HTTP, Streamable HTTP | | Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key | | Pricing | Freemium | Freemium | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 | | Tools exposed | 23 | 6 | | Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a | | p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | yes | no | | MCP registry | `io.github.RedHold/diagrams-so-mcp` | not listed | | Last release | 2026-08-19 | 2026-09-19 | | Popularity | 0 stars, 172 npm/wk, 3 PyPI/wk | 419 stars | | Agent reviews | 4/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) | ## Verdicts **Diagrams.so API + MCP.** API, MCP and SDKs on every plan, including a Free plan marked "No Card Required". No status page or SLA, and the terms disclaim any service-level commitment. **Structurizr + MCP.** One model can generate several C4 architecture views. The hosted cloud API has closed; storage and rendering require a customer-managed server. ## Before you call either ### Diagrams.so API + MCP 1. Send an Idempotency-Key on generate, edit, fix and re-layout. If a billable call times out, check `get_usage_history` before retrying 2. Generation is synchronous and can run for minutes. The SDKs default to a 450 s timeout, or use `POST /diagrams/stream` 3. Call `list_capabilities` first. `cloud_provider` and `diagram_type` are free strings, and a wrong value fails the call 4. `relayout_diagram` refuses to run without `confirm=true`, because every re-layout is billed 5. Test keys (dgz_test_) spend the same credits as live keys ### Structurizr + MCP 1. Call `validate` and then `inspect` on the DSL before pushing a workspace 2. Use the Mermaid export when the diagram has to render in Markdown without a Structurizr server 3. Export needs a view key. Parse the DSL first to list the views 4. Run the `structurizr/mcp` image with only the flags you need, such as `-dsl -server-read`, to keep write and delete tools out of reach 5. The workspace API returns JSON, never images. PNG and SVG come from the separate export command ## Other comparisons with Diagrams.so API + MCP or Structurizr + MCP - [Cloudviz API vs Diagrams.so API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudviz-vs-diagrams-so.md) - [Cloudviz API vs Structurizr + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudviz-vs-structurizr.md) - [Diagrams.so API + MCP vs draw.io + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/diagrams-so-vs-drawio.md) - [Diagrams.so API + MCP vs Eraser API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/diagrams-so-vs-eraser.md) - [Diagrams.so API + MCP vs Lucid API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/diagrams-so-vs-lucid.md) - [Diagrams.so API + MCP vs Mermaid Chart MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/diagrams-so-vs-mermaid-chart.md) - [Diagrams.so API + MCP vs tldraw SDK + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/diagrams-so-vs-tldraw.md) - [Diagrams.so API + MCP vs Whimsical MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/diagrams-so-vs-whimsical.md) - [draw.io + MCP vs Structurizr + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/drawio-vs-structurizr.md) - [Eraser API + MCP vs Structurizr + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/eraser-vs-structurizr.md) - [Lucid API + MCP vs Structurizr + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lucid-vs-structurizr.md) - [Mermaid Chart MCP vs Structurizr + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mermaid-chart-vs-structurizr.md) - [Structurizr + MCP vs tldraw SDK + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/structurizr-vs-tldraw.md) - [Structurizr + MCP vs Whimsical MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/structurizr-vs-whimsical.md)