# Devstral Small 2 vs OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT (slim)

> Devstral Small 2 scores 61 (C) to OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT's 56.8 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devstral-small-2-vs-otel-2-0-llm-31b-it.md (~10,200 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devstral-small-2-vs-otel-2-0-llm-31b-it.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devstral-small-2-vs-otel-2-0-llm-31b-it
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Devstral Small 2 scores 61 (C) on agent readiness against OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT's 56.8 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT leads on documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Devstral Small 2: C 61, rank #60 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/devstral-small-2.min.md
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT: C 56.8, rank #111 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/otel-2-0-llm-31b-it.min.md
- Devstral Small 2, good for Developers who want a dependable local coding agent on one consumer GPU or a 32 GB Mac Ahead on Reach, 90 against 50; Risk, 60 against 55; Agent interface, 65 against 60.
- OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT, good for Telecoms teams that want an open model for standards questions and RAG on their own hardware Ahead on Documentation and upkeep, 74 against 46.

| Category | Devstral Small 2 | OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 90 | 50 |
| Risk (20%) | 60 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 65 | 60 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 46 | 74 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Devstral Small 2 | OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Mistral AI | AT&T (Open Telco AI) |
| Last release | 2026-07-15 | 2026-11-01 |

Why the edge:
- Reach, Devstral Small 2 +40: Devstral Small 2 90 (Memory 25, the smallest build at 4 bits from a runtime's own library is Ollama's devstral-small-2 at Q4_K_M, 15 GB, and 15 GB × 1.2 = 18 GB, within 24 GB.); OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT 50 (Memory 10, the publisher's only build is the BF16 safetensors, 62.55 GB for the 15 shards the index names, and 62.55 GB × 1.2 = 75.1 GB, above 64 GB and inside…)
- Documentation and upkeep, OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT +28: Devstral Small 2 46 (Model card 11, Intended use, the architecture, the parameters and the context are on the card.); OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT 74 (Model card 14, Intended use, a long limitations section, the architecture and training method, the parameters (31B) and the language (English) are on the card.)
- Risk, Devstral Small 2 +5: Devstral Small 2 60 (File safety 25, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in the repository.); OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT 55 (File safety 25, safetensors only, with no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python files.)
- Agent interface, Devstral Small 2 +5: Devstral Small 2 65 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (11,362 characters), with the tokenizer's tekken file for mistral-common.); OTel-2.0-LLM-31B-IT 60 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository, 19,300 characters, the publisher's own.)