# Devstral Small 2 vs occamy-1.0 (slim)

> Devstral Small 2 and occamy-1.0 score within a point of each other for open-weight models you run yourself, 61 and 61 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devstral-small-2-vs-occamy-1-0.md (~8,900 tokens) · this version ~630 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devstral-small-2-vs-occamy-1-0.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devstral-small-2-vs-occamy-1-0
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Devstral Small 2 and occamy-1.0 score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). occamy-1.0 leads on agent interface and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Devstral Small 2: C 61, rank #60 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/devstral-small-2.min.md
- occamy-1.0: C 61, rank #59 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/occamy-1-0.min.md
- Devstral Small 2, good for Developers who want a dependable local coding agent on one consumer GPU or a 32 GB Mac Ahead on Risk, 60 against 55.
- occamy-1.0, good for Agents that want an Apache 2.0 mixture-of-experts model tuned for long tool-using tasks on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac. Ahead on Agent interface, 70 against 65; Documentation and upkeep, 74 against 46.

| Category | Devstral Small 2 | occamy-1.0 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 90 | 90 |
| Risk (20%) | 60 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 65 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 46 | 74 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Devstral Small 2 | occamy-1.0 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Mistral AI | Accio (Accio-Lab) |
| Last release | 2026-07-15 | 2026-10-02 |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (4) |

Why the edge:
- Documentation and upkeep, occamy-1.0 +28: Devstral Small 2 46 (Model card 11, Intended use, the architecture, the parameters and the context are on the card.); occamy-1.0 74 (Model card 14 of 20, languages and a knowledge cut-off are missing.)
- Risk, Devstral Small 2 +5: Devstral Small 2 60 (File safety 25, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in the repository.); occamy-1.0 55 (File safety 25, safetensors only and nothing from the repository runs to load it or build prompts.)
- Agent interface, occamy-1.0 +5: Devstral Small 2 65 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (11,362 characters), with the tokenizer's tekken file for mistral-common.); occamy-1.0 70 (Chat template 20, the base's Jinja template in the repository.)