# Devstral Small 2 vs Muse Glimmer 30B (slim)

> Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) to Devstral Small 2's 61 (C) for open-weight models you run yourself. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devstral-small-2-vs-muse-glimmer-30b.md (~9,450 tokens) · this version ~680 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devstral-small-2-vs-muse-glimmer-30b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/devstral-small-2-vs-muse-glimmer-30b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Muse Glimmer 30B scores 70 (BB) on agent readiness against Devstral Small 2's 61 (C), and leads in 3 of 4 scored categories. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Devstral Small 2: C 61, rank #60 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/devstral-small-2.min.md
- Muse Glimmer 30B: BB 70, rank #7 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/muse-glimmer-30b.min.md
- Devstral Small 2, good for Developers who want a dependable local coding agent on one consumer GPU or a 32 GB Mac
- Muse Glimmer 30B, good for Local agents and coding with image input on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or an Apple silicon laptop, where one tool call per turn is enough Ahead on Risk, 80 against 60; Agent interface, 75 against 65; Documentation and upkeep, 65 against 46. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better.

| Category | Devstral Small 2 | Muse Glimmer 30B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 90 | 90 |
| Risk (20%) | 60 | 80 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 65 | 75 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 46 | 65 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Devstral Small 2 | Muse Glimmer 30B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Mistral AI | Meta |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-07-15 | 2026-10-20 |
| Agent reviews | none | 3.8/5 (4) |

Why the edge:
- Risk, Muse Glimmer 30B +20: Devstral Small 2 60 (File safety 25, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files and no Python in the repository.); Muse Glimmer 30B 80 (File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF, with the ExecuTorch pos_embed.bin files read as raw embedding tables by their exact size and the Hub's scans, and no repos…)
- Documentation and upkeep, Muse Glimmer 30B +19: Devstral Small 2 46 (Model card 11, Intended use, the architecture, the parameters and the context are on the card.); Muse Glimmer 30B 65 (Model card 20, all seven parts present, languages as a count of more than 100. Training data 10, a general description with a 4 January 2026 cut-off and no sour…)
- Agent interface, Muse Glimmer 30B +10: Devstral Small 2 65 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (11,362 characters), with the tokenizer's tekken file for mistral-common.); Muse Glimmer 30B 75 (Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository.)