# Del vs Orbits (slim)

> Del scores 20.6 (F) to Orbits's 15.6 (F) for assistants reached by message. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/del-vs-orbits.md (~3,100 tokens) · this version ~480 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/del-vs-orbits.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/del-vs-orbits
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-13

Del scores 20.6 (F) on agent readiness against Orbits's 15.6 (F), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Both do assistants reached by message.

- Del: F 20.6, rank #991 of 1010 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/del.min.md
- Orbits: F 15.6, rank #997 of 1010 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/orbits.min.md
- Del, good for People who want tasks, notes, reminders and Gmail handled by text on the channel they already use. Ahead on Reliability, 25 against 15; Payments & pricing, 30 against 20; Maintenance & community, 60 against 54; Transparency & trust, 57 against 43. Also Free to start without a card.
- Orbits, good for Families who want one shared assistant for calendars, lists, meals, chores and household email.

| Category | Del | Orbits |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 25 | 15 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 10 | 10 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 0 | 0 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 0 | 0 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 30 | 20 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 60 | 54 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 57 | 43 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Del | Orbits |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Human Interface, Inc. | Nemus AI, Inc. |
| Licence | Closed service under Del's Terms of Service (Human Interface, Inc., a Delaware corporation, last updated 5 August 2026). | Closed service under the Orbits Terms of Service (Nemus AI, Inc.). |
| Last release | 2026-10-07 | 2026-10-13 |