# DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B (slim)

> DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B score within a point of each other for open-weight models you run yourself, 61.9 and 61 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0731-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-1b.md (~10,600 tokens) · this version ~830 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0731-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-1b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-v4-flash-0731-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-1b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 and MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61.9 (C) and 61 (C). MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B leads on reach, risk and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731: C 61.9, rank #33 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/deepseek-v4-flash-0731.min.md
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B: C 61, rank #76 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/minicpm-v-4-7-1b.min.md
- DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731, good for Agents or teams with a multi-GPU server, or a provider account, who want DeepSeek's V4 agent model under MIT with a 1M context Ahead on Agent interface, 75 against 70.
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B, good for Agents that need a cheap local model to read screenshots, photos and short video on a phone, a laptop or beside a bigger model Ahead on Reach, 95 against 70; Risk, 55 against 50; Documentation and upkeep, 48 against 38.

| Category | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 70 | 95 |
| Risk (20%) | 50 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 75 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 38 | 48 |

| Fact (where they differ) | DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 | MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | DeepSeek | OpenBMB |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-07-31 | 2026-10-30 |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | none |

Why the edge:
- Reach, MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +25: DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 70 (Memory 5, because the smallest build of 4-bit or better from a runtime's own library is LM Studio's MXFP4 GGUF at 156.4 GB, which with a fifth added needs 187.7…); MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 95 (Memory 30, OpenBMB's own IQ4_XS GGUF is 0.64 GB, 1.54 GB with the 0.90 GB vision projector, and 1.54 GB × 1.2 = 1.9 GB, which fits 16 GB with room to spare.)
- Documentation and upkeep, MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +10: DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 38 (Model card 8, the card and the DSpark card it names give architecture, parameters and context, with intended use, limitations, languages and cut-off missing.); MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 48 (Model card 8, Intended use (image, multi-image and video understanding on device), architecture (early visual-token compression inside the vision encoder) and p…)
- Risk, MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B +5: DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 50 (File safety 15, safetensors only, less 10 because prompts are built by running DeepSeek's encoding_dsv4.py from the repository and the card's serving commands p…); MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 55 (File safety 25, safetensors in the main repository and the AWQ, GPTQ and int4 builds, GGUF in the GGUF build, with no .bin, .pt, .pth or .py files in the main r…)
- Agent interface, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 +5: DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 75 (Chat template 10, there is no Jinja template and the format is given as Python to run.); MiniCPM-V 4.7 1B 70 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository, 7,249 characters.)