# DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B (slim)

> DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B score within a point of each other for open-weight models you run yourself, 61.5 and 61 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b.md (~10,250 tokens) · this version ~830 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-vs-minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61.5 (C) and 61 (C). MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B leads on reach, risk and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: C 61.5, rank #35 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/deepseek-v4-1-flash.min.md
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B: C 61, rank #77 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/minicpm-v-4-7-35b-a3b.min.md
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, good for Teams with a multi-GPU server who want DeepSeek's agent model under MIT, with the hosted API as a fallback. Ahead on Agent interface, 75 against 70.
- MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B, good for Agents that need to read screenshots, documents and video on a local machine with 24 to 32 GB for the model, under a permissive licence Ahead on Reach, 90 against 60; Risk, 55 against 50; Documentation and upkeep, 68 against 48.

| Category | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 60 | 90 |
| Risk (20%) | 50 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 75 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 48 | 68 |

| Fact (where they differ) | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | DeepSeek | OpenBMB |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-10-17 | 2026-11-03 |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | none |

Why the edge:
- Reach, MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +30: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 60 (Memory scores nothing, because the only build is DeepSeek's own at 510.3 GB, about 612 GB with the fifth added, and nobody's runtime library holds a smaller one…); MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 90 (Memory 25, since OpenBMB's IQ4_XS GGUF with its vision projector is 19.6 GB and needs about 23.6 GB with the fifth added, which fits 24 GB, while its Q4_K_M GGU…)
- Documentation and upkeep, MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +20: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 48 (The cards cover architecture, parameters and context but not intended use, limitations, languages or a cut-off, so 8. Training data is a general description wit…); MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 68 (Model card 8, it covers intended use, architecture and parameters but not limitations, context length, languages or a knowledge cut-off.)
- Risk, MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B +5: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 50 (The weights are safetensors only, but 10 comes off because the card's way to build prompts is running encoding.py from the repository, since there's no Jinja te…); MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 55 (File safety 25, safetensors and GGUF only, no Python in the main repository and no remote code needed.)
- Agent interface, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash +5: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 75 (There's no Jinja template in the 17 October repository, only code to run, so the template line gets 10. DeepSeek documents the DSML tool format both ways and sh…); MiniCPM-V 4.7 35B-A3B 70 (Chat template 20, a Jinja file in the repository.)