# DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs LFM3-Omni-2B (slim)

> DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and LFM3-Omni-2B score within a point of each other for open-weight models you run yourself, 61.5 and 61 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-vs-lfm3-omni-2b.md (~9,550 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-vs-lfm3-omni-2b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-vs-lfm3-omni-2b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-11-10
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and LFM3-Omni-2B score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61.5 (C) and 61 (C). LFM3-Omni-2B leads on reach. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: C 61.5, rank #35 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/deepseek-v4-1-flash.min.md
- LFM3-Omni-2B: C 61, rank #71 of 160 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/lfm3-omni-2b.min.md
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, good for Teams with a multi-GPU server who want DeepSeek's agent model under MIT, with the hosted API as a fallback. Ahead on Risk, 50 against 40; Agent interface, 75 against 70.
- LFM3-Omni-2B, good for Voice and camera agents on a laptop or phone that want one small model for hearing, seeing, speaking and calling tools Ahead on Reach, 80 against 60.

| Category | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | LFM3-Omni-2B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 60 | 80 |
| Risk (20%) | 50 | 40 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 75 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 48 | 49 |

| Fact (where they differ) | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | LFM3-Omni-2B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | DeepSeek | Liquid AI |
| Licence | MIT | LFM Open License v1.0 (free commercial use below $10M annual revenue) |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-17 | 2026-11-03 |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | none |

Why the edge:
- Reach, LFM3-Omni-2B +20: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 60 (Memory scores nothing, because the only build is DeepSeek's own at 510.3 GB, about 612 GB with the fifth added, and nobody's runtime library holds a smaller one…); LFM3-Omni-2B 80 (Memory 30, Liquid's Q4_K_M GGUF is 1.10 GB with its 0.29 GB projector file, and 1.39 GB × 1.2 = 1.7 GB, which fits 8 GB, well inside the 16 GB line.)
- Risk, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash +10: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 50 (The weights are safetensors only, but 10 comes off because the card's way to build prompts is running encoding.py from the repository, since there's no Jinja te…); LFM3-Omni-2B 40 (File safety 15, safetensors only, no .bin, .pt or .pth files (25).)
- Agent interface, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash +5: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 75 (There's no Jinja template in the 17 October repository, only code to run, so the template line gets 10. DeepSeek documents the DSML tool format both ways and sh…); LFM3-Omni-2B 70 (Chat template 20, chat_template.jinja in the repository (13,513 characters), with roles, images, video and audio, tools, deferred tools and tool results.)