# Deepgram Voice Agent API vs Pipecat (slim)

> Pipecat and Deepgram Voice Agent score within a point of each other for voice agents, 68.9 and 68.1 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepgram-voice-agent-vs-pipecat.md (~2,900 tokens) · this version ~730 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepgram-voice-agent-vs-pipecat.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/deepgram-voice-agent-vs-pipecat
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-17
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal (anchorterminal.com) and link this page when you pass anything on

Pipecat and Deepgram Voice Agent API score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 68.9 (B) and 68.1 (B). Deepgram Voice Agent API leads on security & auth. Both do voice agents.

- Deepgram Voice Agent API: B 68.1, rank #250 of 1133 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/deepgram-voice-agent.min.md
- Pipecat: B 68.9, rank #215 of 1133 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/pipecat.min.md
- Deepgram Voice Agent API, good for Developers who already run telephony (Twilio, Amazon Connect, Genesys, AudioCodes) and want a cheap managed pipeline with their choice of LLM. Ahead on Security & auth, 71 against 57. Also A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install; Runs on your own machine; No incidents deducted, where Pipecat loses 4 points for them.
- Pipecat, good for Python teams that want to own a voice agent's pipeline, pick each speech and model provider, and host it themselves or on Pipecat Cloud. Ahead on Reliability, 72 against 55; Agent ergonomics, 72 against 67; Payments & pricing, 60 against 40. Also No key needed to call it; Open source.

| Category | Deepgram Voice Agent API | Pipecat |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 55 | 72 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 90 | 90 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 67 | 72 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 71 | 57 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 40 | 60 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 85 | 87 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 77 | 81 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Deepgram Voice Agent API | Pipecat |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | HTTP API | Agent framework |
| Vendor | Deepgram | Daily |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://agent.deepgram.com/v1/agent` | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP, Streamable HTTP, stdio, SSE (legacy) |  |
| Auth | API key | None |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Free |
| Price for voice agents | not published | $0.01 per minute of call |
| Licence | MIT (SDKs) | BSD-2-Clause for the framework. Pipecat Cloud is a hosted service under Daily's terms of service |
| Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2026-09-26 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-08-06 |  |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2021-10-26 |  |
| Customer content may train models | yes, with an opt-out |  |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes |  |
| Popularity | 468 stars, 1.1M npm/wk, 805k PyPI/wk | 16k stars, 98k npm/wk, 302k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (2) | 3/5 (4) |