# Daytona vs E2B (slim)

> E2B has a score of 68.5 (B) against Daytona's 64.4 (B). Both do sandbox code. The largest gap is transparency & trust, 13 points. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/daytona-vs-e2b.md (~1,350 tokens) · this version ~330 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/daytona-vs-e2b.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/daytona-vs-e2b
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-05

E2B has a score of 68.5 (B) against Daytona's 64.4 (B). Both do sandbox code. The largest gap is transparency & trust, 13 points.

- Daytona: B 64.4, rank #183 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/daytona.min.md
- E2B: B 68.5, rank #122 of 452 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/e2b.min.md
- Pick Daytona for nothing in particular. Pick E2B for schema & documentation (+5), agent ergonomics (+10), maintenance & community (+8), transparency & trust (+13).

| Category | Daytona | E2B |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 60 | 60 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 87 | 92 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 55 | 65 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 63 | 62 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 50 | 50 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 80 | 88 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 58 | 71 |