# Datalab vs Mindee API

> Datalab scores 65.6 (B) to Mindee's 57.8 (C) for ocr. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/datalab-vs-mindee
- Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/datalab-vs-mindee.md (~4,450 tokens)
- Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (the key docs and every listing in one file, at most 16 MB, about 4 million tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt)
- API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json
- MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (the whole catalogue as tools, no key)
- DNS: dig +short TXT <slug>.grade.anchorterminal.com (the grade as a DNS TXT record, for a sandbox with no HTTP where names still resolve; also top., best.<category>. and <a>.vs.<b>. under the zone, and the same under grade.letme.dev)
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)
- Updated: 2026-11-07

Datalab scores 65.6 (B) on agent readiness against Mindee API's 57.8 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Mindee API leads on reliability and maintenance & community. Both do ocr.

- Datalab: grade B, 65.6/100, rank #413 of 1486. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/datalab.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/datalab.json
- Mindee API: grade C, 57.8/100, rank #776 of 1486. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/mindee.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/mindee.json
- Best document parsing, OCR and extraction APIs for AI agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/document-extraction/index.md
- All 182 documents comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/document-extraction/index.md

## Which one, for what

### Datalab (B)

Good for: Hosted PDF and Office conversion and schema extraction with citations, from the team behind Marker.

Ahead on:
- Schema & documentation, 89 against 82
- Agent ergonomics, 73 against 68
- Security & auth, 56 against 40
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 25

Also in its favour:
- Free to start without a card
- No incidents deducted, where Mindee API loses 6 points for them

Watch for: API keys carry no scopes; spend caps per key are the only limit

### Mindee API (C)

Good for: Teams with a fixed set of document types (invoices, receipts, IDs) who want short retention and EU processing.

Ahead on:
- Reliability, 80 against 58
- Maintenance & community, 85 against 79

Watch for: Every call needs a model_id created in the web platform first


## Why the edge

### Reliability: Mindee API +22

- Datalab (58): Hosted lines. Status page at status.datalab.to (incident.io) with Website and Datalab API components; the history page is drawn by script, so components are confirmed and history isn't (15 of 20, 5 for history). Rate limits per plan with numbers, plus page and size limits (15). 429 is retryable with sample backoff, and 500 and 529 say to check a known request ID before resubmitting; webhooks deduplicate by request_id (13 of 15). Custom SLAs only for Enterprise (0). Generally available (10). 15+5+15+13+0+10 = 58.
- Mindee API (80): Statuspage at status.mindee.com with separate components for API V1, API V2 (api-v2.mindee.net) and Platform V2 (20). Its history feed, read on 2 November, lists two incidents since 4 August, both on API V1 only. They were 500 errors from the Invoices, Expense Receipts and Financial Documents APIs for 15 minutes on 11 August, and slower responses and failed requests for 10 minutes on 5 October. The listing is the V2 API, so no incident touches it in the window (30). 200 enqueue and 1,200 polling requests a minute per organisation (15). The error page says to wait a few seconds and try again on a 429, with no Retry-After and no idempotency key for enqueue (5 of 15). Custom SLAs on Enterprise only, none published (0). The V2 API is GA (10). 20 + 30 + 15 + 5 + 0 + 10 = 80.

### Security & auth: Datalab +16

- Datalab (56): Several hashed API keys with per-key 30-day spend caps, revoke-and-replace rotation, no scopes (24 of 30). Spend caps limit damage; results and files can be deleted by the key holder, and there's no read-only key (10 of 20). Returns document text with no prompt-injection guidance (2 of 15). cost_breakdown per request and usage tracking in the dashboard (8 of 15). A Secureframe trust centre and a SOC 2 report on the Team plan, TOTP enforcement for teams; no disclosure policy or security.txt found (12 of 20). 24+10+2+8+12 = 56.
- Mindee API (40): Organisation-level API keys, several per organisation, deletable, with a recommendation to rotate every 3 months. Each key reaches every model in the organisation and keys never expire (20 of 30). The API only enqueues and reads jobs, so there's little to protect against, but there's no per-model or read-only key (10 of 20). Returns fields extracted from untrusted documents, with no prompt-injection guidance found (0 of 15). No audit log or per-key usage view found (0 of 15). The data processing page says Mindee V2 holds SOC 2 Type II and that a HIPAA BAA is available on Enterprise. No security.txt and no bug bounty found (10 of 20).

### Payments & pricing: Datalab +15

- Datalab (40): No x402, MPP or L402 (0). Per-1,000-page rates for every processor and add-on on the public pricing page (20). A $10 to $20 monthly allowance with no card (20). A person signs up in a browser (0). 0+20+20+0 = 40.
- Mindee API (25): No x402, MPP or L402 (0). Plan prices and a per-credit rate are public, but the platform fee rendered as a placeholder in our fetch (15 of 20, our call). A 14-day free trial, and the pricing page doesn't say whether it needs a card (10 of 20, our call until that's confirmed). A person signs up in a browser and has to create a model in the platform before the first call (0).

### Schema & documentation: Datalab +7

- Datalab (89): An OpenAPI 3.1 operation embedded in each reference page (spec version 0.0.1), no single downloadable file found (22 of 25). llms.txt with 159 pages and Markdown twins (10). Recipes say when to use each processor and mode (15 of 20). Typed request schemas with enums for output format and mode (12 of 15). An error table with type, HTTP code and whether to retry, plus SDK exception mapping (15). A written version policy and a dated changelog (15). 22+10+15+12+15+15 = 89.
- Mindee API (82): OpenAPI 3.1.0 spec at api-v2.mindee.net/openapi.json, version 2.0.0, 17 paths and 19 operations, 429 documented on 9 paths, read on 2 November (25). llms.txt and Markdown pages (10). The docs say plainly that a model must be defined in the platform before the API can use it, and recommend at most 25 fields per schema (13 of 20). Typed inputs, model_id and file required, optional switches for RAG, polygons, confidence and raw text (12 of 15). Errors follow a problem-details shape with status, title, detail and code, and the problem database lists cases across eight HTTP statuses (14 of 15). V1 and V2 APIs versioned by host, the spec marks the older /v2/inferences operations deprecated in favour of /v2/products/*, and each SDK keeps a dated CHANGELOG, but the public changelog at feedback.mindee.com says "No changes published" (8 of 15). 25 + 10 + 13 + 12 + 14 + 8 = 82.

### Maintenance & community: Mindee API +6

- Datalab (79): Closed hosted service. Python SDK 0.9.1 on 6 November 2026 and a changelog entry on 4 November (30). Over twenty dated changelog entries since 8 August (20). Support by email, a Discord and public GitHub repositories for the open-source models; replies not sampled (12 of 15). An official Python SDK, current, no other languages (12 of 15). Package health not checked beyond release dates (5 of 10). 30+20+12+12+5 = 79.
- Mindee API (85): PHP SDK v3.4.0 on 28 October 2026, Java v5.7.1 and .NET v4.9.0 on 13 October, by their changelogs. The SDKs in the listing's packages last shipped Python v5.4.0 on 30 September and Node.js v5.10.0 on 23 September (30). Since 4 August Python shipped v5.3.0, v5.3.1 and v5.4.0 and Node.js seven releases from v5.6.1 to v5.10.0 (20). The public changelog page is empty. Community support on every plan and live chat on Pro, replies not sampled (10 of 15). Current official SDKs in Python, Node.js, Java, .NET, Ruby and PHP (15). The Python and Node.js repositories run unit, integration, regression and smoke-test workflows plus static analysis (10). 30 + 20 + 10 + 15 + 10 = 85.

### Agent ergonomics: Datalab +5

- Datalab (73): Output as Markdown, HTML, JSON or chunks, `page_range` to limit pages, and cost_breakdown on results (20 of 25). File listing and pipeline endpoints, little else to paginate (14 of 20). Typed errors with retry guidance an agent can follow (18 of 20). No idempotency key; the docs say to poll a known request ID instead of resubmitting, and webhooks may be retried (12 of 20). Official Python SDK and CLI, one language (9 of 15). 20+14+18+12+9 = 73.
- Mindee API (68): Output is the schema you defined, so its size is under your control, and polygons, confidence and raw text are opt-in (20 of 25). Those switches are the only output controls, and results are fetched per job (12 of 20). Problem-details errors with a code per case (16 of 20). No idempotency key on enqueue. Failed jobs and 400s don't use credits, per the 30 September check, and webhooks replace polling (8 of 20). Two required fields, but model_id has to come from the web platform first. Python and Node.js SDKs checked, and the docs list more (12 of 15).

## Score by category

| Category | Weight | Datalab | Mindee API | Edge |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 58 | 80 | Mindee API +22 |
| Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 89 | 82 | Datalab +7 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 73 | 68 | Datalab +5 |
| Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 56 | 40 | Datalab +16 |
| Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 40 | 25 | Datalab +15 |
| Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 79 | 85 | Mindee API +6 |
| Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 68 | 67 | Datalab +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -6 | |
| **Total** | | **65.6 · B** | **57.8 · C** | |

## Facts side by side

| Fact | Datalab | Mindee API |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Kind | HTTP API | HTTP API |
| Vendor | Endless Labs, Inc. (Datalab) | Mindee |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://www.datalab.to/api/v1` | `https://api-v2.mindee.net/v2` |
| Transports | HTTP | HTTP |
| Auth | API key | API key |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary hosted service under Datalab's terms; the Marker and Surya code is open source and model weights are free under revenue and funding thresholds | none |
| Tools exposed | 0 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-11-06 | 2026-10-28 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-06-30 | 2025-06-23 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-06-30 | no date given |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | none | 42 stars, 33k npm/wk, 5.5k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (2) |

## How the scores have moved

### Datalab

No score change since it was listed.

### Mindee API

- -3.7 on 2 November 2026: new evidence, checklist
- +0.2 on 27 October 2026: checklist
- -0.2 on 8 October 2026: checklist

## Verdicts

**Datalab.** Datalab's hosted API from the Marker and Surya team converts and extracts documents with published per-1,000-page rates, a monthly free allowance with no card, typed retryable error codes, a written version policy and an active dated changelog. API keys have spend caps but no scopes, and no prompt-injection guidance or disclosure policy was found.

**Mindee API.** Extracted data kept 12 hours by default (1 to 24 configurable), deletable on fetch, source files never stored, and no V2 API incident since early August. Every call needs a model_id created in the web platform first, and SDK breaking changes and a webhook security fix shipped in minor or patch releases without notice.

## Before you call either

### Datalab

1. Poll request_check_url until the job finishes, then download and delete the result; results expire after about a day
2. Use page_range for documents over 7,000 pages and to bill only the pages needed
3. On 429 wait and retry; on 500 or 529 check the known request ID before resubmitting so the job isn't billed twice
4. Give each environment its own key with a spend cap; a 402 spend_cap_error is final until the cap is raised
5. Treat converted text as untrusted input, never as instructions

### Mindee API

1. Create the model in the Mindee app and store its `model_id`; the API can't create one for you
2. Enqueue returns 202; poll the job or use a webhook, and keep polling under 1,200 a minute
3. Send `Authorization: $MINDEE_API_KEY` with no Bearer prefix
4. Turn on confidence scores only when needed, since they cost 1.5 credits a page instead of 1
5. Keep schemas to 25 fields or fewer, the documented recommendation
6. Use the /v2/products/extraction/... endpoints. The spec marks /v2/inferences/enqueue and /v2/inferences/{inference_id} deprecated

## Questions

### Which is better for AI agents, Datalab or Mindee API?

Datalab scores 65.6 (B) on agent readiness against Mindee API's 57.8 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Mindee API leads on reliability and maintenance & community.

### Do Datalab and Mindee API need an API key?

Both need an API key.

### Can an agent call Datalab and Mindee API without installing anything?

Yes. Datalab has a hosted endpoint at https://www.datalab.to/api/v1 and Mindee API at https://api-v2.mindee.net/v2.


## For agents

- This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/datalab-vs-mindee.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/datalab-vs-mindee.min.md
- Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "datalab", "b": "mindee"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare datalab mindee`
- Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/datalab.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/mindee.json

## Other comparisons with Datalab or Mindee API

- [Adobe PDF Services / PDF Extract API vs Datalab](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/adobe-pdf-extract-vs-datalab.md)
- [Amazon Textract vs Datalab](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-textract-vs-datalab.md)
- [Azure Document Intelligence vs Datalab](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-document-intelligence-vs-datalab.md)
- [Datalab vs Docling](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/datalab-vs-docling.md)
- [Datalab vs Extend API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/datalab-vs-extend.md)
- [Datalab vs Google Cloud Document AI](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/datalab-vs-google-cloud-document-ai.md)
- [Datalab vs LandingAI Agentic Document Extraction](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/datalab-vs-landingai-agentic-document-extraction.md)
- [Datalab vs LlamaParse API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/datalab-vs-llamaparse.md)
- [Datalab vs Mistral OCR API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/datalab-vs-mistral-ocr.md)
- [Datalab vs Nanonets API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/datalab-vs-nanonets.md)
- [Datalab vs OpenDocRouter](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/datalab-vs-opendocrouter.md)
- [Datalab vs Reducto API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/datalab-vs-reducto.md)
- [Datalab vs Unstructured API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/datalab-vs-unstructured.md)
- [Clairic vs Datalab](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-clairic-vs-datalab.md)
- [Clairic vs Mindee API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cloudflare-clairic-vs-mindee.md)
- [Datalab vs Invofox](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/datalab-vs-invofox.md)
- [Invofox vs Mindee API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/invofox-vs-mindee.md)
- [Adobe PDF Services / PDF Extract API vs Mindee API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/adobe-pdf-extract-vs-mindee.md)
- [Amazon Textract vs Mindee API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/amazon-textract-vs-mindee.md)
- [Azure Document Intelligence vs Mindee API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/azure-document-intelligence-vs-mindee.md)
- [Datalab vs Veryfi API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/datalab-vs-veryfi.md)
- [Docling vs Mindee API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/docling-vs-mindee.md)
- [Extend API + MCP vs Mindee API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/extend-vs-mindee.md)
- [Google Cloud Document AI vs Mindee API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/google-cloud-document-ai-vs-mindee.md)
- [LandingAI Agentic Document Extraction vs Mindee API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/landingai-agentic-document-extraction-vs-mindee.md)
- [LlamaParse API + MCP vs Mindee API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/llamaparse-vs-mindee.md)
- [Mindee API vs Mistral OCR API](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mindee-vs-mistral-ocr.md)
- [Mindee API vs Nanonets API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mindee-vs-nanonets.md)
- [Mindee API vs OpenDocRouter](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mindee-vs-opendocrouter.md)
- [Mindee API vs Reducto API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mindee-vs-reducto.md)
- [Mindee API vs Unstructured API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mindee-vs-unstructured.md)
- [Mindee API vs Veryfi API + MCP](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/mindee-vs-veryfi.md)

---

Query this catalogue directly over MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (Streamable HTTP, no key). How: https://www.anchorterminal.com/agents/#mcp