# Datadog MCP Server vs Grafana MCP Server (slim)

> Grafana MCP Server scores 74.5 (BB) on agent readiness against Datadog MCP Server's 56.6 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Datadog MCP Server leads on security & auth. Both do observability metrics. Category scores, facts, verdicts and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/datadog-mcp-vs-grafana-mcp-server.md (~2,050 tokens) · this version ~780 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/datadog-mcp-vs-grafana-mcp-server.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/datadog-mcp-vs-grafana-mcp-server
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · Updated: 2026-10-09

Grafana MCP Server scores 74.5 (BB) on agent readiness against Datadog MCP Server's 56.6 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Datadog MCP Server leads on security & auth. Both do observability metrics.

- Datadog MCP Server: C 56.6, rank #566 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/datadog-mcp.min.md
- Grafana MCP Server: BB 74.5, rank #69 of 842 · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/grafana-mcp-server.min.md
- Datadog MCP Server, good for Agents that triage production issues across metrics, logs, traces and monitors in a Datadog org. sentry-mcp is narrower and deeper on errors, pagerduty-mcp covers on-call. Ahead on Security & auth, 76 against 65. Also A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install.
- Grafana MCP Server, good for Teams on Grafana, self-managed or Cloud, that want an agent to read dashboards and query Prometheus, Loki, Tempo and Pyroscope, and to work with alert rules, incidents and OnCall. Ahead on Reliability, 91 against 53; Schema & documentation, 81 against 60; Payments & pricing, 60 against 20; Maintenance & community, 95 against 68; Transparency & trust, 79 against 67. Also Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better; Open source.

| Category | Datadog MCP Server | Grafana MCP Server |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Reliability (16%) | 53 | 91 |
| Performance (10%) | pending | pending |
| Schema & documentation (13%) | 60 | 81 |
| Agent ergonomics (13%) | 78 | 74 |
| Security & auth (14%) | 76 | 65 |
| Payments & pricing (10%) | 20 | 60 |
| Task success (10%) | pending | pending |
| Maintenance & community (7%) | 68 | 95 |
| Transparency & trust (7%) | 67 | 79 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Datadog MCP Server | Grafana MCP Server |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | Datadog | Grafana Labs |
| Hosted endpoint | `https://mcp.datadoghq.com/v1/mcp` | no (local only) |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP, stdio | stdio, SSE (legacy), Streamable HTTP |
| Pricing | Your plan | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | none | 119 |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | `io.github.grafana/mcp-grafana` |
| Last release | 2026-09-25 | 2026-10-07 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | 2026-07-10 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text |  |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text |  |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text |  |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text |  |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text |  |
| Popularity | 43 stars | 3.5k stars, 152k PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | none |