# Darwin-36B-Opus vs occamy-1.0 (slim)

> Darwin-36B-Opus and occamy-1.0 score within a point of each other for open-weight models you run yourself, 61 and 61 out of 100. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side.

- Full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/darwin-36b-opus-vs-occamy-1-0.md (~5,950 tokens) · this version ~430 tokens · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/darwin-36b-opus-vs-occamy-1-0.json · canonical https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/darwin-36b-opus-vs-occamy-1-0
- Index: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt · API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json · MCP: https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp · Updated: 2026-10-21
- Licence: CC BY 4.0, credit Anchor Terminal and link this page (https://www.anchorterminal.com/terms/#data)

Darwin-36B-Opus and occamy-1.0 score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 61 (C) and 61 (C). occamy-1.0 leads on reach and documentation and upkeep. Both do open-weight models you run yourself.

- Darwin-36B-Opus: C 61, rank #37 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/darwin-36b-opus.min.md
- occamy-1.0: C 61, rank #51 of 100 open-weight models · https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/occamy-1-0.min.md
- Darwin-36B-Opus, good for Reasoning-heavy text tasks on a 32 GB machine or a single 80 GB GPU, where a disclosed training method isn't required
- occamy-1.0, good for Agents that want an Apache 2.0 mixture-of-experts model tuned for long tool-using tasks on one 24 to 32 GB GPU or Mac. Ahead on Reach, 85 against 80; Documentation and upkeep, 74 against 51. Also Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.5 out of 5.

| Category | Darwin-36B-Opus | occamy-1.0 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Capability (35%) | pending | pending |
| Reach (25%) | 80 | 85 |
| Risk (20%) | 55 | 55 |
| Agent interface (10%) | 70 | 70 |
| Documentation and upkeep (10%) | 51 | 74 |

| Fact (where they differ) | Darwin-36B-Opus | occamy-1.0 |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Vendor | FINAL-Bench (VIDRAFT) | Accio (Accio-Lab) |
| Last release | 2026-04-23 | 2026-10-02 |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |